Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,954 of 10,432    |
|    Nasser M. Abbasi to oldk1331@gmail.com    |
|    Re: if result of dsolve contains integra    |
|    08 Jan 16 19:47:09    |
      From: nma@12000.org              On 1/8/2016 7:42 PM, oldk1331@gmail.com wrote:       > On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 5:05:59 AM UTC+8, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:       >>       >> I find having to write "y x" in place of y(x) when y is operator,       >> really confusing with Axiom/FriCas notation, as it looks like       >> multiplication. But it seems to work with y(x) as well. hum...       >> so y(x) is the same as "y x" when y is operator? very confusing       >> to new user :)       >>       >> --Nasser       >       > Concatenation or "space operator" means function application or       > "() operator" in FriCAS. So you can write "sqrt abs y x" instead of       > "Sqrt[Abs[y[x]]]". I like this notation more than "space stands for       > multiplication". After all, calculus is about algebra and composition       > of functions instead of multiplication of numbers.       >              I am sorry, I can't agree with this. On paper, one writes y(x)       not               y x              Since y x means multiplication, on paper also.              So Axiom/FriCAS notation is very confusing and makes reading       it hard and ambiguous. But since one can write y(x) also,       so it is not a big deal.              --Nasser              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca