Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,312 of 10,432    |
|    clicliclic@freenet.de to Albert Rich    |
|    Re: New report on CAS integration tests.    |
|    27 Mar 17 11:01:15    |
      Albert Rich schrieb:       >       > On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 11:52:26 PM UTC-10, oldk...@gmail.com wrote:       > > On Saturday, March 25, 2017 at 5:25:59 PM UTC+8, Albert Rich wrote:       > > > On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 6:03:19 PM UTC-10, oldk...@gmail.com wrote:       > > > > Off topic a little, I find it interesting that Rubi fails Timofeev 493,       > > > >       > > > > int(x^2/(x*cos(x)-sin(x))^2,x) --> (cos(x) + x*sin(x))/(x*cos(x)       - sin(x))       > > > >       > > > > A pure transcendental function, and easy to solve by heuristic       > > > > methods.       > > >       > > > I'm a little slow. What is the heuristic method used to integrate it?       > > >       > >       > > What I meant is:       > >       > > This integral can be solved if transcendental case of Risch algorithm       > > is implemented.       > >       > > Otherwise, a CAS system might try to solve it using heuristic method,       > > aka integration by parts, guess, etc. For this integral, as Timofeev said,       > > it equals to int( x/sin(x) d(1/(x*cos(x)-sin(x)))), then integration by       part,       > > result is x/sin(x)/(x*cos(x)-sin(x)) + int(1/sin(x)^2,x) .       >       > The best I could come up with using integration by parts as you       > suggested was the following formula:       >       > int(x^m/(cos(x)^(m-2)*(cos(x)+x*sin(x))^2),x) -->       >       > -x^(m-1)/(cos(x)^(m-1)*(cos(x)+x*sin(x))) +       > (m-1)*int(x^(m-2)/cos(x)^m,x)       >       > If m>1 is an integer, x^(m-2)/cos(x)^m is integrable in terms of the       > polylogarithm function. The Timofeev Chapter 7, problem 11 on page       > 344 is the special case when m=2.       >       > If anyone can derive a more general formula, please let me and Rubi       > know.       >              With respect to Timofeev 7.11, you have interchanged SIN(x) and COS(x),       but replacing x by x - pi/2 doesn't give Timofeev's case for m=2 back.              So this will become two new integration rules: One for the even       denominator COS(x) + x*SIN(x) and one for the odd denominator x*COS(x) -       SIN(x).              Presumably x should be replaced by a*x in the final Rubi rules.              Martin.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca