From: nma@12000.org   
      
   On 3/31/2017 12:08 PM, acer wrote:   
      
   > Now, Nasser's testing framework has given Maple's result a "B" grade,   
   >because it's LeafCount size is too large. I would suggest that, while   
   >there may be more than one outlook on grading this result, the leaf-count is   
   not most germane.   
   >   
   >   
      
   hi Acer;   
      
   The current grading function used are listed here   
      
   http://12000.org/my_notes/CAS_integration_tests/reports/rubi_4_1   
   /index.htm#x1-30003   
      
     .....   
     if leafcount(result)<=2*leafcount(optimal) then   
           return "A";   
     else   
           return "B";   
     end if   
     .....   
      
   It is probably hard to get perfect grading scheme. And ofcourse   
   the grading has to be the same for each problem.   
      
   Please feel free to suggest how to modify the grading function if   
   you do not feel it is optimal way of grading.   
      
   Thanks,   
   --Nasser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)