From: //noreply@axelvogt.de   
      
   On 10.04.2017 06:37, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:   
   > But Maple 2016.2 says:   
   ...   
   > z:=exp(I*t);   
   > r:= convert(z,'trig');   
   > int(r^(3/2),t=0..2*Pi);   
   >               0  ------>   
   >   
   > int( z^(3/2),t=0..2*Pi);   
   >                4/3*I ------->   
   >   
   > Mathematica gives same answer to both forms   
   ...   
   >       -(4/3) ------>   
   ...   
   > Can someone explain this difference in Maple result? Is this related to   
   > convention? I assume De Moivre's formula was used at point point?   
      
   It is a bug in Maple.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)