Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,375 of 10,432    |
|    clicliclic@freenet.de to Nasser M. Abbasi    |
|    Re: The Risch algorithm    |
|    16 Apr 17 19:59:13    |
      "Nasser M. Abbasi" schrieb:       >       > [...]       >       > But Maple's Risch algorithm (based on trace, showing it       > called Risch), gives this       >       > -----------------------------       > restart;       > integrand:=ln(x)*ln(x^2);       > sol:=int(integrand,x);       >       > ln(x)*ln(x^2)*x+4*x-2*x*ln(x)-x*ln(x^2)       > -------------------------------------       >       > But Maple's answer differentiates back to the integrand but       > not sympy's answer.       >              Shouldn't the Maple commands have been something like:               restart;        integrand:=ln(x)*ln(x^2);        sol:=risch(integrand,x);              ? According to your trace, int() ends up in Risch-Norman instead.              Martin.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca