Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,400 of 10,432    |
|    Nasser M. Abbasi to oldk1331@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Integrate[ArcTanh[t] Log[t]/(t - 1),    |
|    23 Apr 17 01:40:24    |
      From: nma@12000.org              On 4/23/2017 1:23 AM, oldk1331@gmail.com wrote:       >       >> I do not know is this has analytical antiderivative or not.       >       > When FriCAS returns with an integral symbol, that means       > FriCAS proves it has no elementary antiderivative.       >       > (1) -> integrate(atanh(t) * log(t)/t, t)       >       > t       > ++ atanh(%A)log(%A)       > (1) | ---------------- d%A       > ++ %A       >                     Does this mean that Fricas will not return result like this:              Integrate[ArcTanh[t] Log[t]/t, t]       (1/2)*((-Log[t])*PolyLog[2, -t] + Log[t]*PolyLog[2, t] + PolyLog[3, -t] -       PolyLog[3, t])                     Because "polylog" is not considered elementary function? So Fricas       will return result which only contains elementary functions?              Ok, got it :)              --Nasser              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca