Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,413 of 10,432    |
|    Albert Rich to clicl...@freenet.de    |
|    Re: Integrate[ArcTanh[t] Log[t]/(t - 1),    |
|    27 Apr 17 02:54:05    |
      From: Albert_Rich@msn.com              On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 9:09:43 AM UTC-10, clicl...@freenet.de wrote:       > "Nasser M. Abbasi" schrieb:       > >       > > On 4/26/2017 5:15 AM, Albert Rich wrote:       > > >       > > > An antiderivative of arctanh(t)*log(t)/(t-1) wrt t is:       > > >       > > > -1/2*Log[2]*Log[t]*Log[(1 + t)/2] + 1/4*Log[2]*Log[(1 + t)/2]^2 +       > > > 1/2*Log[1 - t]*Log[t]*Log[1 + t] -       > > > 1/2*Log[2]*Log[(1 + t)/2]*Log[(1 + t)/(2*t)] +       > > > 1/4*Log[1 - t]*Log[(1 + t)/(2*t)]^2 +       > > > 1/4*Log[-(1/t)]*Log[(1 + t)/(2*t)]^2 -       > > > 1/4*Log[(-1 + t)/(2*t)]*Log[(1 + t)/(2*t)]^2 +       > > > 1/2*Log[(1 + t)/(2*t)]*PolyLog[2, 1 + 1/t] -       > > > ArcTanh[t]*PolyLog[2, 1 - t] +       > > > 1/2*Log[1 + t]*PolyLog[2, 1 - t] + 1/2*Log[1 + t]*PolyLog[2, t] -       > > > 1/2*Log[(1 + t)/(2*t)]*PolyLog[2, t] +       > > > 1/2*Log[t]*PolyLog[2, (1 + t)/2] +       > > > 1/2*Log[(1 + t)/(2*t)]*PolyLog[2, (1 + t)/2] -       > > > 1/2*Log[(1 + t)/(2*t)]*PolyLog[2, (1 + t)/(2*t)] -       > > > 1/2*PolyLog[3, 1 + 1/t] -       > > > 1/2*PolyLog[3, 1 - t] - (1/2)*PolyLog[3, t] -       > > > 1/2*PolyLog[3, (1 + t)/2] +       > > > 1/2*PolyLog[3, (1 + t)/(2*t)]       > > >       > > > Taking the difference of evaluating its limits as t approaches 1       > > > and 0 gives 1/8 pi^2 log(2).       > >       > > Amazing. Well done. I assume you found a rule for this and it       > > will be in next Rubi version.       >       > Perhaps a better nose when and how to integrate by parts is all that's       > needed?              Yes, for integrands involving inverse elementary functions, integration by       parts is obviously the way to go. The following partial derivation of Nasser's       integral uses parts twice:              Int[ArcTanh[x]*Log[x]/(x-1),x]              == -ArcTanh[x]*PolyLog[2,1-x] +        Int[PolyLog[2,1-x]/(1-x^2),x]              == -ArcTanh[x]*PolyLog[2,1-x] +        1/2*Int[PolyLog[2,1-x]/(1-x),x] +        1/2*Int[PolyLog[2,1-x]/(1+x),x]              == -ArcTanh[x]*PolyLog[2,1-x] -        1/2*PolyLog[3,1-x] +        1/2*Int[PolyLog[2,1-x]/(1+x),x]              == -ArcTanh[x]*PolyLog[2,1-x] -        1/2*PolyLog[3,1-x] +        1/2*Log[1+x]*PolyLog[2,1-x] +        1/2*Int[Log[x]*Log[1+x]/(x-1),x]              Then I got stuck. Fortunately however, Mathematica's built-in integrator       could integrate log(x)*log(1+x)/(x-1), although for some reason it could not       integrate the original problem.              So if somebody has a better nose than I how to step through the integration of       log(a+b*x)*log(c+d*x)/(e+f*x), Rubi and I would very much like to know...              Albert              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca