Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,474 of 10,432    |
|    Richard Fateman to clicliclic@freenet.de    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Test_Cases_for_Gr=c3=b6bne    |
|    11 Jun 17 13:50:28    |
      From: fateman@cs.berkeley.edu              On 6/11/2017 9:19 AM, clicliclic@freenet.de wrote:              >       > For this input, Maxima is almost two orders of magnitude slower than       > Derive 6.10 - perhaps the implementation is inefficient, or just missing       > some algorithmic tricks.              Possibly the lisp program for the Groebner basis computation is       uncompiled in your configuration.              The Groebner basis may also be run on the       > FriCAS web interface for comparison (but I don't know name and usage of       > the appropriate procedure).       >       > And both FriCAS and Maxima must have a much faster equivalent of       > Derive's POLY_GCD as well.              Yes, the time reported for the gcd is 0.0 seconds.              As I have said to the original poster, if there a computation that can       be done in two ways, and one of them is using a GB calculation,       you can expect that the other way is faster.              RJF              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca