Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,508 of 10,432    |
|    j4n bur53 to Richard Fateman    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Test_Cases_for_Gr=c3=b6bne    |
|    04 Jul 17 18:14:15    |
      From: janburse@fastmail.fm              Hi,              Again, I nowhere said that (its all documented here, you       can re-read). I only explained that I am currently using       a meta-interpreter for single dispatch, I did NOT       say I use homoiconicity for CAS data.              I use single dispatch for CAS algorihms, but again this       doesn't give any implications for the internal datastructures       used. I have a framework that allows plugable translators              between the internal datastructure and some external       representation. This translation is seen by a tiny       detail in the Prolog toplevel. The working of this framework              is very subtle, when Prolog answer substitutions are       not display via the (=)/2 operator, but via the       (is)/2 operator it was externalized:              Here is an example:              ?- X is (A+B)^2.       X is A^2+2*A*B+B^2 /* small detail, result is shown        with (is)/2 instead of (=)/2 */              ?- X is (A+B)^2, write(X), nl.       polynom(0rd4d14e06,[2-1,1-       polynom(0r7e813e8,[1-2]),0-       polynom(0r7e813e8,[2-1])]) / thats the current internal        data structure for a        multivariate polynomial */              There is really no use in explaining me CAS. I can only       repeat that I studied for lets say 4 years computer algebra       systems at ETHZ, under Prof. Erwin Engeler in the 80s.              Those times also people from Maple where at ETHZ, but       they came in slighly later when I already did finish       my studies. Others might know Roman Mäder from Mathematica.              The only thing that interests me right now are GB test cases       and I am looking forward to the future when I will nuke maxima       in that my system will beat it by lengths. I suggest to       make a bet, I can offeer you               A bar of chocolate        http://iml.jou.ufl.edu/projects/fall12/engroff_h/types.html              Or if you would like we could make another bet:               Bet between RJF and Jan Burse        10'000 USD (in words 10 thousend US dollars)              I already feel pitty for the old lady maxima, lets say in 3       years from now, maximas performance will be nowhere compared       to the performance of my system.              Have a Nice day!              Richard Fateman schrieb:       > in yet another message you seem to suggest that the essential       > characteristic of both lisp and prolog for computer algebra       > is homoiconicity (that is, code = data). This is false in       > several respects.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca