Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,531 of 10,432    |
|    bursejan@gmail.com to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Test_Cases_for_Gr=C3=B6b    |
|    06 Jul 17 17:31:06    |
      Forget my Prototype, the R. Fateman conjecture says       GCD algorithms are generally faster than doing       GCD via GB. Mostlikely this conjecture will completely              crash, because of methodological issues. I listed       some of the more foggy issues with this conjecture.       It has nothing to do with my Prototype or my Prolog system.              Am Freitag, 7. Juli 2017 02:24:42 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Fateman:       > On 7/6/2017 4:03 PM, bursejan@gmail.com wrote:       > > So lets say R. Fatemans conjecture is still undecided       > > in my opinion, what evidence do we have so far? Are there       > > some theoretical results that would support R. Fatemans       > > conjecture, not only some lousy maxima benchmarks?       >       > The timing tests show Maxima, and other CAS programs       > are maybe 3000X faster than your program. This is not       > my opinion or your opinion.       >       > Maybe instead of writing messages here, you should go       > off and try to get your program to run maybe 1000X faster.       >       > RJF              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca