Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,543 of 10,432    |
|    bursejan@gmail.com to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Test_Cases_for_Gr=C3=B6b    |
|    07 Jul 17 16:08:30    |
      I nowhere said that. Where did I say this? Again       I am refering to the usual definitions of "Euclidean",       and subsequently "Euclidean GCD".              You are talking rubbish as usual.              Am Samstag, 8. Juli 2017 01:03:46 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Fateman:       > On 7/7/2017 3:41 PM, bursejan@gmail.com wrote:       > > Its not up to me to define the term Euclidean.       > You seem to want to define the term "Euclidean GCD"       >       > Oh dear, Look up "Euclidean GCD" polynomials.       >       > There are other GCD algorithms -- modular, for example.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca