Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,550 of 10,432    |
|    bursejan@gmail.com to All    |
|    Re: Pseudo remainder doesn' work for mul    |
|    08 Jul 17 10:14:33    |
      I am accusing RJF of been dammned stupid. Everybody knows       that polynomials are not an Euclidean Domain, so Algorithm E       cannot work for polynomials.              In the present incarnation, it shows for the given pair,       that it loops. Same for the other pair f,g, I already showed.       And yes Algorithm E is not an algorithm for multivariate              polynomials. What remains to be shown is that Algorithm C       isn't either an algorithm for multivariate polynomials.       But this is way over your head RJF.              Am Samstag, 8. Juli 2017 19:12:02 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Fateman:       > On 7/8/2017 10:05 AM, bursejan@gmail.com wrote:       > > No, I didn't say Knuth is wrong, where do you read       > > this into my post RJF? Can you point me to such a claim       > > by me that Knuth would be wrong?       > >       >       > You said       >       > "       >       > Algorithm E from Knuth loops       >       > ?- X is 2+9*A^2-5*B, Y is 5*A^2*B+5*A*B^2, euclid_gcd(X,Y,R).       > [2,3]       > [3,2]       > [2,5]       > [5,2]       > [2,5]       > [5,2]       > etc...       > "       >       > If a procedure loops indefinitely, it is not an Algorithm.       >       > So you accused Knuth of defining, as Algorithm E, something       > that is not an algorithm.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca