home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.math.symbolic      Symbolic algebra discussion      10,432 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 9,567 of 10,432   
   bursejan@gmail.com to All   
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Test_Cases_for_Gr=C3=B6b   
   11 Jul 17 14:35:49   
   
   So whats the status of the R. Fateman conjecture as of now?   
   Except for the domain blow? Well not much has happened since.   
   RJF still shows his ability to play the fool.   
      
   His current strategy is not to fool around Euclid GCD, but   
   to fool around division algorithms (Euclid, non-Euclid Reduction)   
   etc.. Whats next, fooling around about the arabic zero?   
      
   Will we see a pamphlet posted by RJF, that claims there   
   is no arabic zero, and hence GB for GCD is nonsense. Who   
   knows, I am currious, what the next steps will be by   
      
   RJF, to avoid a substantiation of his conjecture. So far   
   we could only read nonsense. Not a single qualitative   
   argument so far, but the conjecture was clearly   
      
   originally started as a qualitative quest, i.e. performance   
   of algorithm. Is this a joke now, changing the topic to   
   some dunno what properties of CAS systems?   
      
   Stay on topic RJF, and please substantiate your claims.   
      
   Am Dienstag, 11. Juli 2017 23:26:44 UTC+2 schrieb burs...@gmail.com:   
   > But maxima has also a GB library, so what are you bragging about?   
   > Could it be that you belong to the sort of highly confused fellas?   
   > I recommend reading a book once a while, for example:   
   >   
   > David Cox; Little, John; O'Shea, Donald:   
   > Ideals, varieties, and algorithms.   
   > New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997   
   >   
   > So that you know what we are talking about here.   
   >   
   > Am Samstag, 8. Juli 2017 18:02:03 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Fateman:   
   > > On 7/8/2017 5:05 AM, bursejan@gmail.com wrote:   
   > > > I have to retract my criticsm in as far that algorithm   
   > > > C indeed has some aspects that might make it sometimes work.   
   > > > I am still looking for the example where it breaks.   
   > > >   
   > > Maybe in the future when someone offers you advice in private   
   > > email, you will think twice before insisting that the discussion   
   > > be carried on in a newsgroup.   
   > >   
   > > Have a good weekend.   
   > > RJF   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca