Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,582 of 10,432    |
|    Nasser M. Abbasi to Nasser M. Abbasi    |
|    Re: Computer Algebra Independent Integra    |
|    14 Jul 17 16:23:24    |
      From: nma@12000.org              On 7/14/2017 3:03 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:              > Looking at random number of integrals that could not be solved by Rubi,       > I see some have _no_ corresponding model antiderivatives associated with       > them.       >              The input test files have a field in them (third field),       which tells the number of Rubi rules needed to solve the       integral. _If_ this field is zero, it means there is no model       anti-derivative known.              Currently I do not check for this field.              I will try to re-run the final phase of the build which generates       the reports and add a check to see when an integral       could not be solved but it has no known anti-derivative.              May be give it special marker in the table, such as F* instead       of just F to make it more clear.              This way it will be clear which of the integral that failed       have known anti-derivative vs. not.              I can also add a check, if integral actually passes but has no       known anti-derivative. This might be useful also. Will try to       do this later and when done, will update.              --Nasser              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca