m(I+IV/II)   
   Here it would return 3   
   f(m(I+IV/II)   
   Here it would return III   
   Where is the problem?   
   m() would convert/substituite the variables in one expression that are roman   
   numbers too, in integers   
   f() convert one expression inRoman expression (if that expression is just one   
   int, in one Roman number)   
      
   m() would be the 'inverse' of f()   
      
   I don't know where is the problem in speak of Axiom here...   
   Because this not seem one heavy traffic news group   
   because one can see how   
   other language could resolved it   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)