Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,736 of 10,432    |
|    Richard Fateman to clicliclic@freenet.de    |
|    Re: question on Rubi and special functio    |
|    13 Dec 17 13:20:13    |
      From: fateman@cs.berkeley.edu              On 12/10/2017 10:28 AM, clicliclic@freenet.de wrote:       > The next step should be to debug the utility functions              As I recall, I parsed and executed the algebraic integral rules into       lisp, and could solve many integrals, but ran out of steam because       what you call "utility functions" can in principle include any       functionality available to the matching programs.              Which means, in principle, all of Mathematica. To the extent that       my lisp system or someone else's sympy fails to mimic every       Mathematica "utility" in the way expected by Rubi,       the ruleset may not provide the correct       answer. Or in the tests I ran years ago, might fail to converge       on some examples.              Just a caution.              RJF              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca