Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,787 of 10,432    |
|    antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl to All    |
|    Re: More teething help    |
|    26 Jan 18 16:32:28    |
      I wrote:       > Let me recall theory: integrals as above can be reduced to sum       > of three different kinds:       >       > (c+d*x^3)^(1/2)       > x*(c+d*x^3)^(1/2)       > (x - a)^(-1)*(c+d*x^3)^(1/2)              Oops, of course in all three above there should be (c+d*x^3)^(-1/2)              > Note that rules present in Rubi are doing this, so there is no       > point at looking triples different than (m, n, p) = (-1, -1, -1).       >       > First forms above (first and second kind) are no problem: single pattern       > for each. Problem is with third kind. First, to have any chance       > of elementary integral one have to subract apropriate multiple       > of integral of first kind. Second, corrected single term is       > elementary if (a, (c + d*a^3)^(1/2)) is a point of finite order       > on elliptic curve. Third, modulo derivatives of elementary functions       > multiple terms of form       >       > (c + d*a_i)^(1/2)*(x - a_i)^(-1)*(c+d*x^3)^(1/2)              again should contain (c+d*x^3)^(-1/2)              --        Waldek Hebisch              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca