home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.math.symbolic      Symbolic algebra discussion      10,432 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 9,903 of 10,432   
   Ralf Stephan to Richard Fateman   
   Re: question on Rubi and special functio   
   22 Jun 18 00:11:10   
   
   From: gtrwst9@gmail.com   
      
   On Friday, December 15, 2017 at 7:39:09 PM UTC+1, Richard Fateman wrote:   
   > I suspect that the issue I encountered was that intermediate results    
   > from some of the rules (part-way toward the final result) were in    
   > unanticipated  (less concise?) forms than expected, and this inhibited    
   > the appropriate application of additional rules.   
      
   Actually, one of the problems I saw is that the behaviour of the utility   
   functions that are needed to implement conditions on the rules is not   
   identical to the behaviour needed. The concise definition of the needed   
   behaviour is however only available    
   through the Mma code given (the documentation does not suffice to define the   
   behaviour). So, effectively, to implement a working Rubi version reverse   
   engineering of these utility functions is necessary.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca