Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,903 of 10,432    |
|    Ralf Stephan to Richard Fateman    |
|    Re: question on Rubi and special functio    |
|    22 Jun 18 00:11:10    |
      From: gtrwst9@gmail.com              On Friday, December 15, 2017 at 7:39:09 PM UTC+1, Richard Fateman wrote:       > I suspect that the issue I encountered was that intermediate results        > from some of the rules (part-way toward the final result) were in        > unanticipated (less concise?) forms than expected, and this inhibited        > the appropriate application of additional rules.              Actually, one of the problems I saw is that the behaviour of the utility       functions that are needed to implement conditions on the rules is not       identical to the behaviour needed. The concise definition of the needed       behaviour is however only available        through the Mma code given (the documentation does not suffice to define the       behaviour). So, effectively, to implement a working Rubi version reverse       engineering of these utility functions is necessary.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca