Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,911 of 10,432    |
|    j4n bur53 to Ralf Stephan    |
|    Re: How fast do CAS on the market comput    |
|    22 Jun 18 18:53:27    |
      From: janburse@fastmail.fm              Ok, I found another Prolog system which is slower than       SWI-Prolog, newest version, but still can do 9^(9^9)       in reasonable time:               ECLiPSe Constraint Logic Programming System [kernel threads]        Version 7.0 #36 (x86_64_nt), Sun Jan 28 10:18 2018               [eclipse 1]: _ is 9^(9^9).        Yes (20.73s cpu)              Maybe we can speculate they use the same library as       sage, their timing is very similar. Its open source, so       I could lookup the source, to see what they are using.              Ralf Stephan schrieb:        > The Sage version is 8.3.beta6 here but there shouldn't be much       difference to 8.2 with that computation, I think. I also confirmed with       'sage -callgrind' that most of the time (95.6%) is spent in       libgmp.so.23.0.3 in object files starting with "fft...".        >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca