Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,915 of 10,432    |
|    Richard Fateman to S.K.R. de Jong    |
|    Re: Symbolic systems and Ackermann funct    |
|    23 Jun 18 18:23:02    |
      From: fateman@gmail.com              On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 5:34:27 PM UTC-7, S.K.R. de Jong wrote:       > Are there any symbolic systems that can deal with Ackermann       > functions computations?              Can you be more specific on what you mean by "deal"?              It is not especially symbolic. The obvious definition       usually causes problems       with stack space because it is a heavily-recursive function.              Symbolic systems also use stack space, so they suffer the       same fate.                      Here's a definition in lisp.              (defun ackermann (x y)        (cond ((= y 0) 0)        ((= x 0) (* 2 y))        ((= y 1) 2)        (t (ackermann (- x 1) (ackermann x (- y 1))))))              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca