Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.math.symbolic    |    Symbolic algebra discussion    |    10,432 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,978 of 10,432    |
|    Nasser M. Abbasi to Nasser M. Abbasi    |
|    Re: fyi, a new Build of CAS integration     |
|    19 Oct 19 15:46:58    |
   
   From: nma@12000.org   
      
   On 10/19/2019 1:15 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:   
   > On 10/19/2019 1:05 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:   
   >> it next checks for "integral" as long as it is   
   >> part of "exp_integral","sin_integral","cos_integral",   
   >> "sinh_integral","cosh_integral", then it is failed.   
   >   
   > opps, should be   
   >   
   > as long as it is _NOT_ part of ...   
   >   
   > Because I've seen Fricas return "integral" on its own, meaning it is   
   > not a complete evaluation. Do not have an example now to show.   
   >   
      
   Here is example where Fricas returns "integral" for   
   non-evaluated, which is counted as failed:   
      
   integrate(sin(x)^p,x, algorithm="fricas")   
      
    integral(sin(x)^p, x)   
      
   Notice: I am running Fricas from inside sagemath 8.9. The   
   above is what sagemath returns.   
      
   On side note: Notice that there are few issues when calling   
   Fricas from sagemath, where something would fail, but would   
   pass if calling Fricas directly. We talked about this before.   
      
   These are sagemath<->Fricas interface issues and hopefully   
   will be fixed. For example in sagemth 8.9, problem   
   174 in Hearn file gives   
      
   ---------------------   
   sage: var('x')   
   sage: integrate(sqrt(2)*x^2 + 2*x,x, algorithm="fricas")   
    File "
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca