From: nma@12000.org   
      
   On 11/23/2019 3:12 PM, Albert Rich wrote:   
      
   > Above you give the percentage of integrals solved for each system, no matter   
   how unnecessarily large and complicated the result.  It should be noted that   
   your test result summary also gives the following more meaningful percentage   
   of optimal or near    
   optimal results (i.e. a grade of A) that Rubi, Mathematica and Maple produce:   
   >   
   > 98.7%  Rubi 4.16.1   
   > 75.8%  Mathematica 12   
   > 51.7%  Maple 2019.1   
   >   
   > The other systems are graded in a much more lenient way, and therefore   
   should be removed from your "Table 3: Antiderivative Grade distribution for   
   each CAS".   
   >   
   > Albert   
   >   
      
   Sure. Will re-run the Latex/HTML generation to remove the other CAS   
   systems from the grading tables and charts since those are not actually graded   
   (no grading function exist for them. I do not know Python well enough to   
   translate your grading function I use now to Python to use it inside sagemath).   
      
   But this will take sometime. Will try to do it after final exams.   
      
   --Nasser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)