From: Albert_Rich@msn.com   
      
   On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 12:26:27 PM UTC-10, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:   
   > On 11/23/2019 3:12 PM, Albert Rich wrote:   
   >      
   > > Above you give the percentage of integrals solved for each system, no   
   matter how unnecessarily large and complicated the result.  It should be noted   
   that your test result summary also gives the following more meaningful   
   percentage of optimal or near    
   optimal results (i.e. a grade of A) that Rubi, Mathematica and Maple produce:   
   > >    
   > > 98.7%  Rubi 4.16.1   
   > > 75.8%  Mathematica 12   
   > > 51.7%  Maple 2019.1   
   > >    
   > > The other systems are graded in a much more lenient way, and therefore   
   should be removed from your "Table 3: Antiderivative Grade distribution for   
   each CAS".   
   > >    
   > > Albert   
   > >    
   >    
   > Sure. Will re-run the Latex/HTML generation to remove the other CAS   
   > systems from the grading tables and charts since those are not actually   
   graded   
   > (no grading function exist for them. I do not know Python well enough to   
   > translate your grading function I use now to Python to use it inside   
   sagemath).   
   >    
   > But this will take sometime. Will try to do it after final exams.   
   >    
   > --Nasser   
      
   The grading program is pretty short and straight-forward.  Maybe if you post   
   it on a Python website, somebody might translate it for you...   
      
   Albert   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)