Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.med.psychobiology    |    Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho    |    4,734 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,772 of 4,734    |
|    Oliver Crangle to All    |
|    Why None of the NSA's Ideas Are Worth Sp    |
|    23 Mar 14 13:49:56    |
      From: rpattree2@gmail.com              Header_logo.v2               SEARCH        Header_share_logo.v2 1.3k Share Tweet       Why None of the NSA's Ideas Are Worth Spreading       1.3k       SHARES               Share Tweet        WHAT'S THIS?        Richardledgettnsadeputydirectorted       Richard Ledgett, Deputy Director, NSA, speaks with Chris Anderson via video at       TED2014 for the panel, "The Next Chapter, Session 8 - Hackers," on       March 17-21, 2014, at the Vancouver Convention Center, in Vancouver, Canada.       IMAGE: FLICKR, JAMES DUNCAN DAVIDSON       BY WILL POTTER2 days ago       Mashable Op-Ed       This post reflects the opinions of the author and not necessarily those of       Mashable as a publication.       What's the National Security Agency's idea worth spreading?              TED's Chris Anderson put the trademark question to NSA Deputy Director Richard       Ledgett on Thursday during an interview at the Vancouver conference. Ledgett's       answer: "Learn the facts."              SEE ALSO: How TED Got Edward Snowden and the NSA Deputy Director Onstage              In true TED style, that's a surprising, thought-provoking statement. The       problem is that it's not the NSA's idea at all. It's the idea of their enemy       number one: whistleblower Edward Snowden.              If it were up to the NSA, we wouldn't know any facts at all about their       operations. We wouldn't even know what questions to ask.              The only reason we know about PRISM — and how every user of the Internet is       being watched, and how the NSA is monitoring world leaders, and how porn       habits were monitored to discredit "radicals," (and on, and on) — is because       Snowden leaked NSA        documents.              We have no idea of the scope of the NSA's operations, but what we do know was       only possible because of a whistleblower.              It was surreal to sit at TED listening to Ledgett say "this is a really       important conversation" to 1,200 attendees with a straight face, because the       one and only reason the NSA had this rare public discussion at all today was       — you guessed it —Edward        Snowden.              Yesterday, Snowden risked his safety and freedom by speaking to TED attendees       from an undisclosed location, via robotic display. His appearance surprised       everyone — including, Ledgett said, the NSA: He awkwardly joked: "Kudos to       you guys on that."              Overnight, Snowden's interview had already racked up 300,000 views, and the       NSA, which had previously not bothered to respond to TED's invitation, had to       engage the discussion.              TED's Chris Anderson attempted to use the rare opportunity to get some actual       facts and data out of Ledgett, to no avail. At one point Anderson asked about       the NSA's claims that Snowden's leaks have put American lives at risk. Ledgett       dodged it, and        Anderson asked again.              "The capabilities [of the NSA] are applied in very discreet and measured and       controlled ways," Ledgett responded. "As adversaries see that and recognize,       'Hey, I might be vulnerable to that,' they move away from that." It was an       ambiguous, empty, non-       answer.              As was with the rest of Ledgett's commentary: all rhetoric, no facts. A better       way to describe the NSA's "idea worth spreading" might be:              Trust us and stop worrying: If you aren't doing anything wrong, Ledgett said,       "you’re not of interest to us.” What he ignored is that the NSA is       vacuuming up information, and storing it indefinitely, so that it may be used       against you later.              We don't know what we need, so we need it all: Ledgett said he didn't know       what NSA surveillance was important, because it's all pieces of a bigger       puzzle. The reality is that the NSA isn't working with a mosaic or a puzzle.       What the NSA is really        advocating is the collection of millions of pieces from different, undefined       puzzles in the hopes that sometime, someday, the government will be working on       a puzzle and one of those pieces will fit.              A website called badguys.com "would be awesome," Ledgett said, and a big help       catching bad guys.                     What's refreshing, though, is that none of the NSA's ideas seem to be       spreading at TED. This is my first TED conference. I'm here as a TED Fellow,       and I was unsure how Snowden's comments — and my own talk about how the FBI       labels protesters as "eco-       terrorists" — would be received.              It's one thing to take to the TED stage and talk about curing disease or a       cool new app. But Snowden? Addressing a bunch of CEOs and tech elite who have       paid at least $7,500 to attend? How would they respond?              The crowd here has been supportive of Snowden's whistleblowing. When Anderson       asked the crowd whether Snowden's actions were "fundamentally heroic," more       than half raised their hands. After Snowden spoke, lines formed to take       selfies with his robot.              Ledgett was applauded at the end of the interview, and a few TEDsters       attempted a standing ovation. But I asked several of those who stood, and they       told me it was for the discussion forum TED created, rather than Ledgett's       comments. Regardless of how        they feel about the specifics of what he did, and how he did it, almost       everyone seems to appreciate that it has created a vibrant, overdue debate.              Perhaps the best indication of this atmosphere came just moments before       Ledgett took the stage. Ed Yong, a science writer, spoke about his research on       parasitic behavior, and asked the audience: "Are there dark sinister parasites       who are influencing our        behavior without us knowing about it?"              "Besides the NSA?"              Will Potter is a TED Fellow and the author of Green Is the New Red. Follow him       on Twitter @will_potter.              TOPICS: EDWARD SNOWDEN, NSA, TED, U.S., US & WORLD       Get our hottest stories delivered to your inbox.       SIGN UP FOR OUR PERSONALIZED DAILY NEWSLETTER                                    Load Comments       Powered by Livefyre       More in US & World               US & WORLD       5 Organizations to Support on World Water Day       2K SHARES                      US & WORLD       The Moment Turkey Shot Down a Syrian Fighter Jet, Caught on Live TV       929 SHARES               US & WORLD       Turkey Tightens Twitter Ban, Blocks Access to Servers       1.8K SHARES               US & WORLD       Behind Wildlife Data: The Animals That Make Research Possible       1.2K SHARES               US & WORLD       NSA Hacked and Spied on Huawei, Snowden Documents Say       981 SHARES       ABOUT US       JOBS       ADVERTISE       SUBSCRIBE       PRIVACY       TERMS       Mashable        ©2005-2014 Mashable, Inc.       Reproduction without explicit permission is prohibited. All Rights Reserved.       Designed in collaboration with Code & Theory              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca