Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.med.psychobiology    |    Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho    |    4,734 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,831 of 4,734    |
|    Oliver Crangle to All    |
|    No, Weed Won't Rot Your Brain: Can casua    |
|    17 Apr 14 16:29:36    |
      From: rpattree2@gmail.com              No, Weed Won't Rot Your Brain               by Maia SzalavitzApr 17, 2014 5:45 am EDT        Can casual marijuana use damage the brains of young adults? A new study says       yes--but its participants suggest otherwise.        facebook        twitter        google plus        email        All across the Internet, headlines are screaming Buzzkill and Marijuana Makes       Young Brains Go to Pot. But a new study, published in the Journal of       Neuroscience, does not in any way prove that casual marijuana use is bad for       your brain.               140416-szalavitz-weed-brain-tease        The Daily Beast        In order to understand why, all you need to do is actually read the       research--and be able to think a bit critically. You don't need to know       anything particular about fMRI or any other scary acronyms and you don't need       to know your amygdala from your        Shatner's Bassoon. You don't even need to know any statistics.               Here's the first big problem. The 20 marijuana-smoking participants, who took       the drug at least once a week, were deliberately selected to be healthy. If       they had any marijuana-related problems--or any psychiatric problems or other       issues--they were        excluded from participating.               Are you beginning to see what's wrong? Although the pot-smoking participants       showed brain differences in comparison to the controls who were also selected       to be normal--both groups were normal! If the smokers had any ma       ijuana-related problems or any        type of impairment, they would not have been included in the first place.       Therefore, the brain changes that the researchers found were--by       definition--not associated with any cognitive, emotional, or mental problems       or differences.               "I'm disappointed that scientists are still able to publish high-profile       papers that only look at neuroimaging without a behavioral endpoint," says       Carl Hart, an associate professor of psychology at Columbia University who was       not associated with the        research (Disclosure: he and I worked on a book project together). Hart       compares the findings to brain differences found between the genders. "There       are structural differences between men and women in certain areas," he says,       but they don't predict        differences in ability. "We don't say this means women are impaired," he adds.               The authors claim that the differences they saw could mean that these       participants are at risk of future problems--but we know that 35 percent of       young adults 18-20 have smoked marijuana in the past year, with a full 1 in 5       reporting smoking at least        once in the past month.               Once they reach age 26, however, less than 1 percent have marijuana problems       serious enough to be classified as addiction. What that means is that whatever       brain changes are seen in casual users, they don't predict addiction,       otherwise, all casual users        would become addicted--or at least, a much larger proportion than actually do.       We've already had several generations of American adults who survived far       higher rates of marijuana use than we see now--without encountering a major       epidemic of cognitive        impairment, schizophrenia, or lack of motivation.               Sadly, this isn't even the only issue with the study. "Just casual use appears       to create changes in the brain in areas you don't want to change," lead author       Hans Breiter, professor of psychiatry at Northwestern University Feinberg       School of Medicine,        told USA Today. But note that Breiter hedges by saying "appears to create,"       rather than "creates." That's because this type of study cannot determine       cause and effect: while it did show that the heavier users in the sample       seemed to have more extreme        changes than the lighter users, this does not prove that higher doses cause       greater brain changes. That's because pre-existing differences in people's       brains may lead them to use more or less marijuana-- and the scans may simply       be picking up on these        differences.               Does this imply that marijuana is completely benign and everyone should smoke       all day, every day? Of course not! But what it does mean is that, as we       consider policy changes like legalization, we need a far more skeptical and       intelligent press. Marijuana        itself may or may not impair cognition-- but discussions of marijuana policy       clearly do so, in a way that is detrimental to our political health.                                    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/04/17/no-weed-won-t-r       t-your-brain.html               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca