Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.med.psychobiology    |    Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho    |    4,734 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,009 of 4,734    |
|    Dr. AR Wingnutte, PhD to All    |
|    Decreased Ability to Identify Odors Can     |
|    08 Oct 14 12:35:25    |
      From: drarwingnuttephd@gmail.com              Decreased Ability to Identify Odors Can Predict Death        Olfactory dysfunction is a harbinger of mortality               Released: 25-Sep-2014 10:00 AM EDT        Embargo expired: 1-Oct-2014 2:00 PM EDT        Source Newsroom: University of Chicago Medical Center        more news from this source        Contact Information        Available for logged-in reporters only        Citations        PLOS One, October 1, 2014        Newswise -- For older adults, being unable to identify scents is a strong       predictor of death within five years, according to a study published October       1, 2014, in the journal PLOS ONE. Thirty-nine percent of study subjects who       failed a simple smelling        test died during that period, compared to 19 percent of those with moderate       smell loss and just 10 percent of those with a healthy sense of smell.        The hazards of smell loss were "strikingly robust," the researchers note,       above and beyond most chronic diseases. Olfactory dysfunction was better at       predicting mortality than a diagnosis of heart failure, cancer or lung       disease. Only severe liver damage        was a more powerful predictor of death. For those already at high risk,       lacking a sense of smell more than doubled the probability of death.        "We think loss of the sense of smell is like the canary in the coal mine,"       said the study's lead author Jayant M. Pinto, MD, an associate professor of       surgery at the University of Chicago who specializes in the genetics and       treatment of olfactory and        sinus disease. "It doesn't directly cause death, but it's a harbinger, an       early warning that something has gone badly wrong, that damage has been done.       Our findings could provide a useful clinical test, a quick and inexpensive way       to identify patients        most at risk."        The study was part of the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project       (NSHAP), the first in-home study of social relationships and health in a       large, nationally representative sample of men and women ages 57 to 85.        In the first wave of NSHAP, conducted in 2005-06, professional survey teams       from the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago used a       well-validated test--adapted by Martha K. McClintock, PhD, the study's senior       author--for this field        survey of 3,005 participants. It measured their ability to identify five       distinct common odors.        The modified smell tests used "Sniffin'Sticks," odor-dispensing devices that       resemble a felt-tip pen but are loaded with aromas rather than ink. Subjects       were asked to identify each smell, one at a time, from a set of four choices.       The five odors, in        order of increasing difficulty, were peppermint, fish, orange, rose and       leather.        Measuring smell with this test, they learned that:        * Almost 78 percent of those tested were classified as "normosmic,"       having normal smelling; 45.5 percent correctly identified five out of five       odors and 29 percent identified four out of five.        * Almost 20 percent were considered "hyposmic." They got two or three       out of five correct.        * The remaining 3.5 percent were labelled "anosmic." They could       identify just one of the five scents (2.4%), or none (1.1%).        The interviewers also assessed participants' age, physical and mental health,       social and financial resources, education, and alcohol or substance abuse       through structured interviews, testing and questionnaires. As expected,       performance on the scent test        declined steadily with age; 64 percent of 57-year-olds correctly identified       all five smells. That fell to 25 percent of 85-year-olds.        In the second wave, during 2010-11, the survey team carefully confirmed which       participants were still alive. During that five-year gap, 430 (12.5%) of the       original 3005 study subjects had died; 2,565 were still alive.        When the researchers adjusted for demographic variables such as age, gender,       socioeconomic status (as measured by education or assets), overall health, and       race, those with greater smell loss when first tested were substantially more       likely to have died        five years later. Even mild smell loss was associated with greater risk.        "This evolutionarily ancient special sense may signal a key mechanism that       affects human longevity," noted McClintock, the David Lee Shillinglaw       Distinguished Service Professor of Psychology, who has studied olfactory and       pheromonal communication        throughout her career.        Age-related smell loss can have a substantial impact on lifestyle and       wellbeing, according to Pinto, a member of the university's otol       ryngology-head and neck surgery team. "Smells impact how foods taste. Many       people with smell deficits lose the joy of        eating. They make poor food choices, get less nutrition. They can't tell when       foods have spoiled or detect odors that signal danger, like a gas leak or       smoke. They may not notice lapses in personal hygiene."        "Of all human senses," Pinto said, "smell is the most undervalued and       underappreciated--until it's gone."        Precisely how smell loss contributes to mortality is unclear. "Obviously,       people don't die just because their olfactory system is damaged," McClintock       said.        The research team, which includes biopsychologists, physicians, sociologists       and statisticians, is considering several hypotheses. The olfactory nerve, the       only cranial nerve directly exposed to the environment, may serve as a       conduit, they suggest,        exposing the central nervous system to pollution, airborne toxins, pathogens       or particulate matter.        McClintock noted that the olfactory system also has stem cells which       self-regenerate, so "a decrease in the ability to smell may signal a decrease       in the body's ability to rebuild key components that are declining with age       and lead to all-cause mortality.       "               The study, "Olfactory Dysfunction Predicts 5-year Mortality in Older Adults,"       was funded by the National Institutes of Health--including the National       Institute on Aging, the Office of Women's Health Research, the Office of AIDS       Research, the Office of        Behavioral and Social Sciences Research--and the McHugh Otolaryngology       Research Fund, the American Geriatrics Society, and the Institute of       Translational Medicine at the University of Chicago.               [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca