Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.med.psychobiology    |    Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho    |    4,734 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,299 of 4,734    |
|    23x11.5c@gmail.com to All    |
|    Psychiatric "screeners" often bounty hun    |
|    04 Dec 14 15:43:22    |
      From: unk...@googlegroups.com              UNJUSTIFIED PSYCHIATRIC       COMMITMENT in the U.S.A.              by Lawrence Stevens, J.D.                     In 1992, U.S. Representative Patricia Schroeder of Colorado held       hearings investigating the practices of psychiatric hospitals in the       United States. Rep. Schroeder summarized her committee's findings as       follows: "Our investigation has found that thousands of adolescents,       children, and adults have been hospitalized for psychiatric treatment       they didn't need; that hospitals hire bounty hunters to kidnap       patients with mental health insurance; that patients are kept against       their will until their insurance benefits run out; that psychiatrists       are being pressured by the hospitals to increase profit; that       hospitals 'infiltrate' schools by paying kickbacks to school       counselors who deliver students; that bonuses are paid to hospital       employees, including psychiatrists, for keeping the hospital beds       filled; and that military dependents are being targeted for their       generous mental health benefits. I could go on, but you get the       picture" (quoted in: Lynn Payer, Disease- Mongers: How Doctors, Drug       Companies, and Insurers Are Making You Feel Sick, John Wiley & Sons,       Inc., 1992, pp. 234-235).                     A headline on the front page of the July 6, 1986 Oakland,       California Tribune reads: "Adolescents are packing private mental       hospitals But do most of them belong there?" The newspaper article       says: "...mental patients advocates say many adolescents in private       hospitals are not seriously mentally ill, but merely rebellious. By       holding the adolescents, who often dislike hospitalization, advocates       say private hospitals reap profits and please parents. ... Some       county mental health officials and psychiatrists at private hospitals       acknowledge there are hospitalized adolescents who, ideally, shouldn't       be there. ... 'It distresses me to see kids in these facilities; it       distressesme to see the profits going on,' Jay Mahler, of Patients       Rights Advocacy and Training, said two weeks ago at a Concord Public       forum. 'It's a hot business,' Tim Goolsby, a Contra Costa County       Probation Department adolescent placement supervisor, later agreed.       'If your kids like sex, drugs, and rock'n'roll, that's the place to       put them. I'm not sure insurance companies know what's going on, but       they're being ripped off.' Goolsby estimated 80 percent of       adolescents in Contra Costa private psychiatric hospitals are not       mentally ill... University of Southern California sociologists       Patricia Guttridge and Carol Warren say these adolescents have been       transformed from delinquents to emotionally disturbed children. After       studying 1,119 adolescents in four Los Angeles-area psychiatric       hospitals, they found that less than a fifth were admitted for serious       mental illnesses" (Susan Stern, The Tribune (Oakland, California),       Sunday, July 6, 1986, p. A-1 & A-2).                     In the February 1988 Stanford Law Journal Lois A.       Weithorn, Ph.D., a former University of Virginia psychology professor,       said "adolescent admission rates to psychiatric units of private       hospitals have jumped dramatically, increasing over four-fold between       1980 and 1984. ... I contend that the rising rates of psychiatric       admission of children and adolescents reflect an increasing use of       hospitalization to manage a population for whom such intervention is       typically inappropriate: 'troublesome' youth who do not suffer from       severe mental disorders" (40 Stanford Law Review 773 at 773-774).                     Psychiatric and psychological "diagnosis" is arbitrary and       unreliable. Furthermore, the supposed experts responsible for these       "diagnoses" are usually biased in favor of commitment because of their       personal economic concerns or their affiliation with the psychiatric       "hospital" where the "patient" is or will be confined. Psychiatric       "hospitals", like all businesses, need customers. In the case of       psychiatric "hospitals", they need patients. They not only want       patients, they need them to stay in business. Similarly, individual       psychiatrists and psychologists need patients to make money and earn a       living. A magazine article published in 1992 criticizing the trend       towards locking up troublesome teenagers alleged that teenagers are       locked up in psychiatric hospitals today more than in the past because       "busy parents are less willing to deal with their behavior and because       inpatient psychiatric business represents a profitable market in the       health-care field." The result has been an increase in the number of       psychiatric hospitals in recent years, "from 220 in 1984 to 341 in       1988". This increase in the number of psychiatric hospitals has       resulted in keen competition between hospitals and psychiatrists for       patients. "Keeping all those psychiatric beds filled is critical, and       administrators are aggressively ensuring that they will be. Hard-sell       TV, radio, and magazine ads (up to tenfold in the past few years,       according to Metz) are ubiquitous ... Some facilities even resort to       paying employees and others bonuses of $500 to $1,000 per       referral. ... Rebellious teenagers used to be grounded. New they're       being committed. Increasingly, parents are locking up their unruly       kids in the psychiatric wards of private hospitals for engaging in       what many therapists call normal adolescent behavior. Adolescent       psychiatric admissions have gone up 250 or 400 percent since 1980,       reports Holly Metz in The Progressive (Dec. 1991), but it's not       because teens are suddenly so much crazier than they were a decade       ago. Indeed, the Children's Defense Fund suggests that at least 40       percent of these juvenile admissions are inappropriate, while a Family       Therapy Networker (July/Aug. 1990) youth expert puts that figure at 75       percent" (Lynette Lamb, "Kids in the Cuckoo's Nest Why are we locking       up America's troublesome teens?", Utne Reader, March/April pp. 38,       40).                     In her book And They Call It Help - The Psychiatric       Policing of America's Children, published in 1993, Louise Armstrong       laments "the 65 percent of kids in private, for-profit psych hospitals       who simply do not need to be there but are given severe-sounding       labels nonetheless" (Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., p. 167 - italics in       original).                     Unjustified involuntary commitment to psychiatric       hospitals has become so blatant Reader's Digest published an article       in the July 1992 issue exposing the unethical practice:                     "Similar storm clouds are appearing over the mental -       health field. Alarmed by exploding costs, insurance companies began              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca