Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.med.psychobiology    |    Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho    |    4,734 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,324 of 4,734    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?4oqZ77y/4oqZ?= to All    |
|    How epigenetics, our gut microbiome and     |
|    10 Jan 15 09:00:02    |
      From: hounddog23x@gmail.com              How epigenetics, our gut microbiome and the environment interact to change our       lives       Ben Locwin | September 15, 2014 | Genetic Literacy Project       85101       Screen Shot 2014-04-15 at 1.28.09 PM              There's been increasing media coverage recently harkening back to Lamarck and       inheritance of genetic code that changes in response to the environment       (epigenetics).              "Lamarckism" as it came to be called was eschewed for more than a hundred       years after its initial proposition because it was thought that genes were       static (this reminds me of how Einstein originally developed a model which       required an expanding universe,        then he added a coefficient (the 'Cosmological Constant') to return its       behavior to a static state, which later in hindsight was found to be wrong).       Now it appears Lamarck, while overstating the plasticity of genes, was on to       something.              Epigenetics suggests that our genes are constantly in a state of flux, exposed       and changing in response to environmental factors. But are these changes       indeed heritable? Currently, there isn't yet consensus that environment,       epigenetics, and inheritance        intersect or a valid theory for how genes behave in organisms. But now that       Lamarckism back in the public's vernacular there will be countless studies       performed to support or refute the thesis.              Research shown at the American Association for the Advancement of Science 2014       conference supported some conjecture that epigenetics and some form of       heritability are in fact linked. That suggests that much of our lives and life       trajectories could in        actual fact reflect a sensitive interplay between our environment, genes       (epigenetics) and microbiome, as in illustrated in the Venn              Screen Shot 2014-04-15 at 10.33.54 AM              diagram, in which the intersection of all of these factors is, quite simply,       'us.'              The proposed Venn of the interplay of our environment, adaptable genes, and       microbiome. At the center intersection: Us.              External environment              We are influenced by external factors (sunlight, environmental toxins, stress,       temperature, etc.), all of which can, to varying degrees, alter our genes.       I've already explained in another article how something as simple as       grapefruit can downregulate (       inhibit the activity of) enzymes produced by our genes, making it more likely       the external environment will interact with our body; grapefruits interact       with more than 90 drugs              DNA_UV_damage              because of this effect. It's also been shown that the ultraviolet part of the       spectrum in sunlight causes manifest changes in cellular DNA, which can lead       to skin cancer.              We also know of chemicals and drugs that have teratogenic (adversely influence       the proper genetic development) properties. A Lancet study from 2012 showed       that 510,000 deaths occurred worldwide as a result of congenital disorders.       Therefore, we know of        many external mechanisms and their impact on our body, potentially through       epigenetic means. The penultimate forerunner of epigenetics is the Hygiene       Hypothesis, which states that lack of early exposure to foreign bodies       (bacteria, viruses, parasites,        allergens, etc.) is associated with a dysregulated (i.e., not functioning       normally) immune system.              The Microbiome              News coverage has flirted with the topic of digestive microbiome       (euphemistically called 'gut health' or similar). What I read is often       misquoted from the research literature, 'extrapolated' and generalized beyond       the study data and littered with        anecdotes. What IS clear is that as a society we are, on average, too       clean.post-2282-Human-Microbiome-Project-Decod-YCSc              The microbiome usually refers to the flora that colonizes our digestive       systems. I specifically didn't refer to this (logically enough) as the       'internal environment.' Why? Here's the reality to our 'internal' and       'external' environments: The human body        has developed in such a way that the alimentary canal (digestive system) forms       a path through the body. In this way, the body basically envelops the space       that is the alimentary system; therefore your digestive system is outside of       your body. Let's think        about that again: Inside your digestive system is outside of your body. Your       body accesses nutrients through digestion from food passing through, but these       nutrients pass through your intestinal walls, and your body is effectively       separated from the food        by many layers of cellular lamina; the food is really outside of your body. By       contrast, those things inside of your body, such as organs, blood, etc. are       designed to be axenic - this term means 'free from foreign bodies.' If you       weren't axenic, that        would mean that you had an active infection.              A big portion of this is the microbiome of the gut. It has been estimated that       there are 10-100 times more organisms in the human gut than comprise the       entire human body. For this reason, there is an incredible, largely invisible       world, of cellular        communication, symbiosis and chemistry occurring between 'us' and our       microbiome. Strictly speaking, we could consider these organisms to be       'outside' of our body, based on what I described earlier. But either way make       no mistake: Without our intestinal        flora, we would not survive. They are part (a large part) of our immune       system, they help digest food, they keep us free from illness by out-competing       foreign pathogens (by producing bacteriocins, fatty acids, and taking up       surface area to prevent        pathogen implantation), and so forth.              Our intestinal colonies have also been targeted for study because of how they       make antioxidants in cocoa available for our bodies to use. And there is       marked impact of this: a meta-analysis (a study of studies) of 20 research       papers showed a marked drop        in blood pressure in those who consumed dark chocolate or cocoa daily; this is       a direct result of the fermentation and further digestion of these compounds       made possible by our microbiome.              How Do These Three Pieces Interact?              As shown in the Venn diagram, there is a circularity here. Each of the       elements influences the other: Our environment provides the stimulus for       epigenetics; our microbiome influences epigenetics; our environment influences       our microbiome.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca