Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.med.psychobiology    |    Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho    |    4,736 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,646 of 4,736    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?4oqZ77y/4oqZ?= to All    |
|    What is the difference between a homeles    |
|    08 Jun 15 02:52:52    |
      From: hounddog23x@gmail.com              Hallucination, or Divine Revelation?        "Madness" used to be considered an affliction of the spirit--demonic       possessions, or Godly visions. Now it's treated as a medical issue. What does       this mean for contemporary believers?                      Hieronymus Bosch / Wikimedia        2.7k 313        EMMA GREEN        JUN 5, 2015               What is the difference between a homeless man who claims to speak to God and a       saint who says the same? When I posed this question to Andrew Scull, the       author of the recent book Madness in Civilization: A Cultural History of       Insanity, he chuckled and        cited a quip by the philosopher Bertrand Russell: "From a scientific point of       view, we can make no distinction between the man who eats little and sees       heaven and the man who drinks much and sees snakes."               When Russell said it, it was an atheist's diss against mystical visions, and       against religion generally. Coming from Scull, it's more of an invitation to       explore the complicated relationship between religion and madness over       thousands of years of        cultural history. Scull argues that stories of the supernatural--often paired       with stories of madness--have long been a source of power for religious       organizations, proof of their authority to interpret the presence of the       divine--and evil--on earth.                      ADVERTISEMENT               Over time, though, the relationship between religion and madness has become       more ambiguous. Science has transformed the way many modern believers and       religious institutions approach faith. For a long time, the influence of God       or Satan was a sufficient        explanation for all sorts of phenomena, from so-called possessions to the       kinds of visions supposedly experienced by Catherine of Siena or Teresa of       Avila. Now, those who decode visions and possessions are psychiatrists, not       priests, and explanations are        rooted in the individual mind, not the interference of God or the devil.               In the deserts of ancient Israel, a homeless man who was said to have visions       and perform miracles was revered by some as the son of God. Which leaves two       questions: How should claims of divine encounters be interpreted in the modern       world? And if a        homeless man on the street were actually the messiah, would he be recognized?               * * *               As it turns out, being a biblical prophet isn't a foolproof shield against       accusations of insanity. "If you look at the history of the Old Testament       prophets, the answer is hard to disentangle," Scull explained. "Many parts of       their lives are seen as mad        or possibly possessed, and only over time do some of them get reinterpreted as       inspired." Throughout biblical times, apparent mental disturbances were often       seen as divine punishments or demonic possessions. Rarely, they were       understood as heavenly        visions. But even this boundary was fluid. "Saul is seen at one point as       behaving like a prophet, then later on people see him as not entirely right in       the head, attributing that to God punishing him for not slaughtering everybody       when he was supposed to,       " Scull said.               Throughout biblical times, apparent mental disturbances were often seen as       divine punishments or demonic possessions.        One of the main points of Scull's book is that interpretations of madness have       changed dramatically over centuries and across cultures. It's unclear, for       example, whether manifestations of madness in ancient times would be       recognizable as mental illness        today. But Scull does offer a sort of common-sense definition of how instances       of madness have been identified over time: disruptive behavior, disturbed       perception, loss of speech, diminished emotional or rational control.       Especially in the early        centuries A.D., he writes, identifying and curing this kind of behavior helped       Christianity spread across the eastern Mediterranean and, eventually, the       Roman Empire. During this time, healings and exorcisms were a common       preliminary rite before baptisms.        Just as Jesus had demonstrated a power to cast out demons, so early Christian       leaders claimed to rid people of demonic possession--or lead them away from       sin, if their madness was seen as punishment from an angry God.               Divine visions were also an important part of how Christians proved their       spiritual authority and claimed to distinguish their religion from that of       pagans (although the legitimacy of the visions depended heavily on who was       having them, and who was        interpreting them). "The presence of miracles and saints was an important       calling card of Christians--that's the way they converted pagan Europe," Scull       said. Christian leaders collected and distributed the body parts of saints and       martyrs as relics and        urged laymen to pray to them for divine intercession. They believed certain       people who had divine visions could produce demonstrable miracles, including       ridding people of supposed possessions, and those powers were thought to       linger after their death. "       Typically, saints whose martyrdom had involved beheading or some damage to the       head--those were the saints who seemed to have particular power over mental       disturbance," Scull said.                      In the Middle Ages, as medical practice began to develop, cases of madness       were often treated as both spiritual and physical. "Physicians conceded that       some cases of madness were really possessions, or things that belonged to       divine," Scull said. Those        cases might be referred to priests. But others, the doctors argued, "were       theirs, because they were rooted in the body, in the humors."               In Europe, things started to change in the 16th century. These were the first       days of the Scientific Revolution and the so-called Age of Reason, marked by       the rise of rational philosophy and scientific invention. The Catholic Church       was still an        incredibly powerful force in European culture, but it also wasn't the same       institution as 10 centuries prior. Powerful challenges to the Church's       authority had spread through Western Europe. During and following the       Protestant Reformation, accusations of        madness were often used as a form of political power, used to argue for the       legitimacy of one Christian denomination over another.               In the Middle Ages, "physicians conceded that some cases of madness were       really possessions, or things that belonged to divine."               [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca