Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.med.psychobiology    |    Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho    |    4,734 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,656 of 4,734    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?4oqZ77y/4oqZ?= to All    |
|    Thirteen Rules for Dealing with Sociopat    |
|    10 Jun 15 08:19:08    |
      From: bulldog23x@gmail.com              Thirteen Rules for Dealing with Sociopaths in Everyday Life              The first rule involves the bitter pill of accepting that some people       literally have no conscience, and that these people do not often look like       Charles Manson or a Ferengi bartender. They look like us.              In a contest between your instincts and what is implied by the role a person       has taken on -- educator, doctor, leader, animal-lover, humanist, parent -- go       with your instincts.               Whether you want to be or not, you are a constant observer of human behavior,       and your unfiltered impressions, though alarming and seemingly outlandish, may       well help you out if you will let them. Your best self understands, without       being told, that        impressive and moral-sounding labels do not bestow conscience on anyone who       did not have it to begin with.              When considering a new relationship of any kind, practice the Rule of Threes       regarding the claims and promises a person makes, and the responsibilities he       or she has.               Make the Rule of Threes your personal policy. One lie, one broken promise, or       a single neglected responsibility may be a misunderstanding instead. Two may       involve a serious mistake. But three lies says you're dealing with a liar, and       deceit is the        linchpin of conscienceless behavior. Cut your losses and get out as soon as       you can. Leaving, though it may be hard, will be easier now than later, and       less costly.              Do not give your money, your work, your secrets, or your affection to a       three-timer. Your valuable gifts will be wasted.              Question authority.        Once again -- trust your own instincts and anxieties, especially those       concerning people who claim that dominating others, violence, war, or some       other violation of your conscience is the grand solution to some problem. Do       this even when, or especially        when, everyone around you has completely stopped questioning authority. Recite       to yourself what Stanley Milgram taught us about obedience. (At least six out       of ten people will blindly obey a present, official-looking authority to the       bitter end.) The        good news is that having social support makes people somewhat more likely to       challenge authority. Encourage those around you to question, too.              Suspect flattery.        Compliments are lovely, especially when they are sincere. In contrast,       flattery is extreme, and appeals to our egos in unrealistic ways. It is the       material of counterfeit charm, and nearly always involves an intent to       manipulate. Manipulation through        flattery is sometimes innocuous and sometimes sinister. Peek over your       massaged ego and remember to suspect flattery. This "flattery rule" applies on       an individual basis, and also at the level of groups and even whole nations.       Throughout all of human        history and to the present, the call to war has included the flattering claim       that one's own forces are about to accomplish a victory that will change the       world for the better, a triumph that is morally laudable, justified by its       humane outcome, unique        in human endeavor, righteous, and worthy of enormous gratitude. Since we began       to record the human story, all of our major wars have been framed in this way,       on all sides of the conflict, and in all languages the adjective most often       applied to the word        war is the word holy. An argument can easily be made that humanity will have       peace when nations of people are at last able to see through this masterful       flattery.              If necessary, redefine your concept of respect.        Too often, we mistake fear for respect, and the more fearful we are of       someone, the more we view him or her as deserving of our respect.              I have a spotted Bengal cat who was named Muscle Man by my daughter when she       was a toddler, because even as a kitten he looked like a professional       wrestler. Grown now, he is much larger than most other domestic cats. His       formidable claws resemble those        of his Asian leopard-cat ancestors, but by temperament, he is gentle and       peace-loving. My neighbor has a little calico who visits. Evidently the       calico's predatory charisma is huge, and she is brilliant at directing the       evil eye at other cats. Whenever        she is within fifty feet, Muscle Man, all fifteen pounds of him to her seven,       cringes and crouches in fear and feline deference.              Muscle Man is a splendid cat. He is warm and loving, and he is close to my       heart. Nonetheless, I would like to believe that some of his reactions are       more primitive than mine. I hope I do not mistake fear for respect, because to       do so would be to ensure        my own victimization. Let us use our big human brains to overpower our animal       tendency to bow to predators, so we can disentangle the reflexive confusion of       anxiety and awe. In a perfect world, human respect would be an automatic       reaction only to those        who are strong, kind, and morally courageous. The person who profits from       frightening you is not likely to be any of these.              The resolve to keep respect separate from fear is even more crucial for groups       and nations. The politician, small or lofty, who menaces the people with       frequent reminders of the possibility of crime, violence, or terrorism, and       who then uses their        magnified fear to gain allegiance is more likely to be a successful con artist       than a legitimate leader. This too has been true throughout human history.              Do not join the game.       Intrigue is a sociopath's tool. Resist the temptation to compete with a       seductive sociopath, to outsmart him, psychoanalyze, or even banter with him.       In addition to reducing yourself to his level, you would be distracting       yourself from what is really        important, which is to protect yourself.              The best way to protect yourself from a sociopath is to avoid him, to refuse       any kind of contact or communication.       Psychologists do not usually like to recommend avoidance, but in this case, I       make a very deliberate exception. The only truly effective method for dealing       with a sociopath you have identified is to disallow him or her from your life       altogether.        Sociopaths live completely outside of the social contract, and therefore to       include them in relationships or other social arrangements is perilous. Begin       this exclusion of them in the context of your own relationships and social       life. You will not hurt        anyone's feelings. Strange as it seems, and though they may try to pretend       otherwise, sociopaths do not have any such feelings to hurt.              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca