Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.med.psychobiology    |    Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho    |    4,734 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,903 of 4,734    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?4oqZ77y/4oqZ?= to All    |
|    The Sum of Our Parts > Putting the micro    |
|    03 Nov 15 00:02:55    |
      From: deputyfife23x@gmail.com              The Scientist >> Magazine >> Features                     The Sum of Our Parts              Putting the microbiome front and center in health care, in preventive       strategies, and in health-risk assessments could stem the epidemic of       noncommunicable diseases.              By Janice Dietert and Rodney Dietert | July 1, 2015              (c) DUNG HOANG              Looking across generations at how health concerns have changed over the past       century is an enlightening exercise. For your ancestors living in the roaring       '20s, fear of infectious diseases--including typhoid fever, cholera, and       influenza--far outweighed        concerns about heart disease or cancer. Autism, Alzheimer's, attention deficit       disorder, and Parkinson's disease were virtually unheard of. Allergies, then       called hay fever, were around, but not common. Ratchet ahead through the       rock-and-roll and disco        generations and on to the '80s and '90s, and the fear of cancer grew       enormously, while a number of new diseases began to appear on the radar       screen. Asthma, autism, lupus, arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease,       attention deficit disorder, celiac disease,        multiple sclerosis, obesity, and diabetes, among others, became common       concerns. Fast-forward another two decades to present day, and it is not a       matter of whether you, your friends, or family members have one of these       ailments, but which ones and how        many.              In less than 100 years, leading diseases and causes of death have shifted       dramatically away from infectious diseases and heavily toward noncommunicable       diseases (NCDs), not just in developed countries, but around the globe. NCDs       are now the number one        killer worldwide, accounting for 63 percent of all mortalities.1 There is no       question that environmental variables, including exposure to cigarette smoke,       certain dietary factors, and chemicals such as heavy metals, pesticides,       endocrine disruptors, or        particular drugs, increase one's risk of developing an NCD. Psychosocial       stressors also play a role. But any assumption that the ongoing NCD epidemic       is due solely to external factors would be missing a key part of the story:       the human microbiome. In        reality, the NCD epidemic is as much about the ways we have altered our       microbiomes in recent decades as it is about our changing external environment.              Commensal microbes that live on and in us are critical for our health. By cell       numbers, we are approximately 90 percent microbial, and the vast majority of       the genes expressed in our superorganism are not on our mammalian chromosomes       but in the bacteria,        archaea, and single-celled eukaryotes that call the human body home. Normally,       a robust microbiome would be part of our inheritance, a legacy passed, largely       maternally, from generation to generation. But recently that chain has been       broken, usually more        than once. The increase in cesarean deliveries, the reduced prevalence and       duration of breastfeeding, overuse of antibiotics both as prescription drugs       and in agriculture, modern urban living surrounded by sanitizers, and a       general tendency to limit        contact with the environment have changed our relationship with the microbes       that are an integral part of our biology. In today's world, our best chance of       acquiring microbes might be from touching our computer keyboards and       cellphones or frequenting        shopping malls, hotel rooms, or doctors' offices--and many are not bugs you       want in and on your body.              In less than 100 years, leading diseases and causes of death have shifted       dramatically away from infectious diseases and heavily toward noncommunicable       diseases.              Our microbial gatekeeper       The human microbiome plays a critical role as a filter between us and the       world. In fact, it is the microbiome that determines our actual exposure to       the environment. Substances such as foods, drugs, and environmental       chemicals--collectively termed        xenobiotics--must first pass through the layers of microbiota on the skin, in       the gut, and in the airways where, depending upon the microbes present, the       chemicals will be sequestered, excluded, or metabolized before they ever enter       our cells. The common        gut actinobacterium Eggerthella lenta, for example, can significantly change       the potency of the cardiac drug digoxin.2 Likewise, microbiome composition       affects the toxicity of certain environmental chemicals such as arsenic, with       some sulfur-reducing gut        bacteria able to generate highly toxic, thiolated species of arsenic, thereby       increasing health risks following exposure.3 And, of course, diverse gut       microbes are critical components of our gastrointestinal system, helping us       process the otherwise hard-       to-digest foods we eat.              There is also a flip side to the xenobiotic-microbiome relationship: the       external environment affects the composition of our microbial populations.       Even some xenobiotics that were previously thought to be safe may need to be       reexamined in light of        effects on the microbiome. For example, commonly used food emulsifiers such as       polysorbate 80 and carboxymethylcellulose have been reported to adversely       affect the microbiome of rodents, predisposing them to chronic inflammation       and elevated risk of        metabolic syndrome. In one study, mice that drank the emulsifiers in water       showed reduced overall diversity of the gut microbiota, decreased       representation of generally beneficial Bacteroidales species, and higher       numbers of some potentially pathogenic        bacteria, such as Ruminococcus gnavus.4 In some rodent strains, exposure to       the emulsifiers also thinned the mucus barrier, reducing the physical distance       between bacteria residing on the surface of the barrier and gut epithelial       cells by more than 50        percent. Such alterations can affect the interactions between bacteria and       cells of the innate immune system, increasing the risk of inflammation-driven       disease. Not coincidentally, microbiomes that have been impoverished or       unbalanced by environmental        factors often have a skewed bacterial metabolism, affecting their host's       energy utilization, hormone status, and control of inflammation.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca