home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.med.psychobiology      Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho      4,734 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,487 of 4,734   
   =?UTF-8?B?4oqZ77y/4oqZ?= to All   
   Low-income workers who live in RVs are b   
   29 Jun 17 18:42:56   
   
   From: logic23x@gmail.com   
      
   Low-income workers who live in RVs are being 'chased out' of Silicon Valley   
   streets | US news | The Guardian   
      
   RVs along El Camino Real in Palo Alto.   
       
   Low-income workers who live in RVs are being 'chased out' of Silicon Valley   
   streets   
      
   In the ‘highest income region of the universe’, people trying to make ends   
   meet face a ban on vehicles from parking in the same spot for longer than 72   
   hours   
      
   Sign up to our monthly Outside in America newsletter   
      
   Supported by   
   Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation    
   About this content   
   View more sharing options   
   Shares   
   1,256   
   Alastair Gee in Palo Alto, California     
   Thursday 29 June 2017 06.00 EDT Last modified on Thursday 29 June 2017 16.08   
   EDT   
      
   In a Silicon Valley town where the median home value is $2.5m, next to a   
   university with a $22.5bn endowment, not far from a shopping mall with   
   Burberry and Cartier outlets, they present an eye-popping sight: dozens of   
   run-down RVs and trailers parked in    
   a line along a main road.   
      
      
   Their homeless inhabitants must live in a way that is, to put it mildly, not   
   the norm for somewhere like Palo Alto. “I try not to use the restroom unless   
   I have to because it costs money to go and drain it, and I don’t want an   
   odor to build up,”    
   said a man called Frank Aldama on Tuesday, with the forested outskirts of   
   Stanford University visible through his screen door.   
      
      
   To keep the grungy carpet in the 30-year-old vehicle clean, he sprays it with   
   Febreze every morning. And he is fastidious about the exterior, “so people   
   don’t have a reason to want you to leave, other than maybe being an   
   eyesore”.   
      
      
   The number of RVs in this part of Palo Alto has spiked this year, and no   
   wonder. For Aldama and others like him, the city feels like a respite. Crime   
   is minimal. Some trailers face groves of oak and eucalyptus trees, others look   
   onto playing fields where    
   parents cheer children playing soccer. But their toehold here has begun to   
   feel tenuous.   
      
   Amid complaints from residents, Palo Alto has announced it will enforce a rule   
   that bans vehicles from parking in the same spot for longer than 72 hours. The   
   RV dwellers must accede – they have few other options. Silicon Valley was   
   recently ranked the    
   second most inaccessible region in the country for low-income workers trying   
   to find a place to live. Palo Alto’s minimum wage is $12 an hour, but   
   someone would have to earn $42.69 an hour to rent a two-bedroom apartment   
   while having enough left over    
   for other necessities.   
      
    Frank Aldama has lived in his RV for four years.   
    Frank Aldama has lived in his RV for four years. Photograph: Alastair Gee for   
   the Guardian   
   For many people, the RV symbolizes the freedom of the open road, but for those   
   living permanently in their vehicles, perhaps brimming with belongings and   
   containing rudimentary hygiene and cooking facilities, the horizons often seem   
   foreclosed.   
      
   The county in which Palo Alto is located is committing $950m for affordable   
   housing, but in the meantime, tolerance of the crisis sometimes ebbs, as in   
   the neighboring town of Mountain View, where the presence of over 200 RVs has   
   prompted complaints.   
      
   On Tuesday in Palo Alto, meanwhile, there were 40 to 45 RVs and trailers   
   parked along a busy stretch of road.   
      
      
   Mike Becker, 52, said he arrived in the Bay Area at the age of 20 and began   
   living in the vehicle a few years ago after his rent was raised and he lost a   
   carpentry job. The RV was free on Craigslist and makes sense because if he   
   rented a home, “I    
   wouldn’t have enough to pay for food”. He added, “I’m stigmatized with   
   the rest of the RVers. I get the sense they think we’re dirtbags.”   
      
      
   Nicholas Newbury, 35, emerged from a beaten-up trailer with a tarp tied   
   roughly over the top for privacy and protection from the weather. “I’m not   
   upset about it,” he said of the city’s plan, “but at same time, where   
   else do they want us to go?   
    (He only sleeps occasionally in the trailer, which is not his; at nights he   
   searches the trash on Stanford’s campus looking for cans to sell to   
   recyclers.)   
      
   RV dwellers are often local, said Brian Greenberg of LifeMoves, an   
   organization that helps homeless people move into housing. “There’s this   
   myth that we attract people from all over the place, and it really is a myth.   
   Most of the people are what I’   
   d say are our people – they graduated from local high schools on the   
   peninsula, in Silicon Valley. People aren’t as mobile as one would think.”   
      
   Another California city with a large homeless population, Santa Barbara, has   
   opened a parking lot where people living in RVs can stay safely overnight, but   
   Greenberg said his organization had opted against that idea. “Those things   
   tend to become more    
   permanent and take the pressure off finding a real solution,” he said.   
   “You look at these vehicles – they have hundreds of thousands of miles on   
   them, they’re not hooked up to septic, there’s frequently not running,   
   fresh water, inadequate    
   toilet facilities.” It is not a way to treat people, he argued, “in the   
   highest income region of the universe.”   
      
    Nicholas Newbury: ‘I’m not upset about it, but at same time, where else   
   do they want us to go?’   
    Nicholas Newbury: ‘I’m not upset about it, but at same time, where else   
   do they want us to go?’ Photograph: Alastair Gee for the Guardian   
   Palo Alto’s decision to implement the 72-hour rule was prompted partly by   
   complaints, though the intention is not to banish people living in vehicles,   
   said city spokeswoman Claudia Keith. The city rescinded its ban on inhabiting   
   cars and RVs several    
   years ago. Instead, the goal is to remove vehicles that are abandoned or used   
   as storage, and Keith suggested that the ordinance is relatively toothless.   
   “They have to move half a mile according to the law, so potentially they   
   could drive around the    
   block, I suppose, and re-park,” she said.   
      
      
   Stanford, for its part, has “noted the additional parking of RVs” on its   
   borders, said spokesman EJ Miranda by e-mail. “This is a reflection of the   
   very challenging economic circumstances faced by many people in this   
   region,” he said. He did not    
   respond to a question about whether the university supported the move, but   
   said that the city was acting in accordance with the law.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca