Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.med.psychobiology    |    Dialog and news in psychiatry and psycho    |    4,734 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,487 of 4,734    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?4oqZ77y/4oqZ?= to All    |
|    Low-income workers who live in RVs are b    |
|    29 Jun 17 18:42:56    |
      From: logic23x@gmail.com              Low-income workers who live in RVs are being 'chased out' of Silicon Valley       streets | US news | The Guardian              RVs along El Camino Real in Palo Alto.               Low-income workers who live in RVs are being 'chased out' of Silicon Valley       streets              In the ‘highest income region of the universe’, people trying to make ends       meet face a ban on vehicles from parking in the same spot for longer than 72       hours              Sign up to our monthly Outside in America newsletter              Supported by       Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation        About this content       View more sharing options       Shares       1,256       Alastair Gee in Palo Alto, California        Thursday 29 June 2017 06.00 EDT Last modified on Thursday 29 June 2017 16.08       EDT              In a Silicon Valley town where the median home value is $2.5m, next to a       university with a $22.5bn endowment, not far from a shopping mall with       Burberry and Cartier outlets, they present an eye-popping sight: dozens of       run-down RVs and trailers parked in        a line along a main road.                     Their homeless inhabitants must live in a way that is, to put it mildly, not       the norm for somewhere like Palo Alto. “I try not to use the restroom unless       I have to because it costs money to go and drain it, and I don’t want an       odor to build up,”        said a man called Frank Aldama on Tuesday, with the forested outskirts of       Stanford University visible through his screen door.                     To keep the grungy carpet in the 30-year-old vehicle clean, he sprays it with       Febreze every morning. And he is fastidious about the exterior, “so people       don’t have a reason to want you to leave, other than maybe being an       eyesore”.                     The number of RVs in this part of Palo Alto has spiked this year, and no       wonder. For Aldama and others like him, the city feels like a respite. Crime       is minimal. Some trailers face groves of oak and eucalyptus trees, others look       onto playing fields where        parents cheer children playing soccer. But their toehold here has begun to       feel tenuous.              Amid complaints from residents, Palo Alto has announced it will enforce a rule       that bans vehicles from parking in the same spot for longer than 72 hours. The       RV dwellers must accede – they have few other options. Silicon Valley was       recently ranked the        second most inaccessible region in the country for low-income workers trying       to find a place to live. Palo Alto’s minimum wage is $12 an hour, but       someone would have to earn $42.69 an hour to rent a two-bedroom apartment       while having enough left over        for other necessities.               Frank Aldama has lived in his RV for four years.        Frank Aldama has lived in his RV for four years. Photograph: Alastair Gee for       the Guardian       For many people, the RV symbolizes the freedom of the open road, but for those       living permanently in their vehicles, perhaps brimming with belongings and       containing rudimentary hygiene and cooking facilities, the horizons often seem       foreclosed.              The county in which Palo Alto is located is committing $950m for affordable       housing, but in the meantime, tolerance of the crisis sometimes ebbs, as in       the neighboring town of Mountain View, where the presence of over 200 RVs has       prompted complaints.              On Tuesday in Palo Alto, meanwhile, there were 40 to 45 RVs and trailers       parked along a busy stretch of road.                     Mike Becker, 52, said he arrived in the Bay Area at the age of 20 and began       living in the vehicle a few years ago after his rent was raised and he lost a       carpentry job. The RV was free on Craigslist and makes sense because if he       rented a home, “I        wouldn’t have enough to pay for food”. He added, “I’m stigmatized with       the rest of the RVers. I get the sense they think we’re dirtbags.”                     Nicholas Newbury, 35, emerged from a beaten-up trailer with a tarp tied       roughly over the top for privacy and protection from the weather. “I’m not       upset about it,” he said of the city’s plan, “but at same time, where       else do they want us to go?        (He only sleeps occasionally in the trailer, which is not his; at nights he       searches the trash on Stanford’s campus looking for cans to sell to       recyclers.)              RV dwellers are often local, said Brian Greenberg of LifeMoves, an       organization that helps homeless people move into housing. “There’s this       myth that we attract people from all over the place, and it really is a myth.       Most of the people are what I’       d say are our people – they graduated from local high schools on the       peninsula, in Silicon Valley. People aren’t as mobile as one would think.”              Another California city with a large homeless population, Santa Barbara, has       opened a parking lot where people living in RVs can stay safely overnight, but       Greenberg said his organization had opted against that idea. “Those things       tend to become more        permanent and take the pressure off finding a real solution,” he said.       “You look at these vehicles – they have hundreds of thousands of miles on       them, they’re not hooked up to septic, there’s frequently not running,       fresh water, inadequate        toilet facilities.” It is not a way to treat people, he argued, “in the       highest income region of the universe.”               Nicholas Newbury: ‘I’m not upset about it, but at same time, where else       do they want us to go?’        Nicholas Newbury: ‘I’m not upset about it, but at same time, where else       do they want us to go?’ Photograph: Alastair Gee for the Guardian       Palo Alto’s decision to implement the 72-hour rule was prompted partly by       complaints, though the intention is not to banish people living in vehicles,       said city spokeswoman Claudia Keith. The city rescinded its ban on inhabiting       cars and RVs several        years ago. Instead, the goal is to remove vehicles that are abandoned or used       as storage, and Keith suggested that the ordinance is relatively toothless.       “They have to move half a mile according to the law, so potentially they       could drive around the        block, I suppose, and re-park,” she said.                     Stanford, for its part, has “noted the additional parking of RVs” on its       borders, said spokesman EJ Miranda by e-mail. “This is a reflection of the       very challenging economic circumstances faced by many people in this       region,” he said. He did not        respond to a question about whether the university supported the move, but       said that the city was acting in accordance with the law.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca