From: onepointmaxslu@gmail.com   
      
    >1/10/22 11:37, Jeff wrote:   
   30/09/2022 19:10, Douglas Eagleson wrote:   
   >> I saw a news bight on a possible size to the postulated weapon that   
   >> hit the pipelines.  In general it's size limited so as to not be   
   >> identifiable. This kind of issue places the yield at several tons of   
   >> tnt.  Maybe a top size of 100 tons.   
   >>   
   >> Nukes this size require a close nuclear survey for a conclusive id.   
   >> Then a study of the data can determine whose nuke it was. This is like   
   >> abstract finger printing   
   >   
   > Why use a nuke????????   
   > The job can be done with a couple of pounds of plastic.   
   >   
   > Jeff   
      
   Sure. The disaster movie of the weapons is that with few nickels you   
   could a lot of damages. Let's look at some figured numbers:   
      
   Costs of sanctions   
      
   -20   ->     -50   
      
   Cost of sabotages   
      
   -10    ->   -100   
   or   
   -100   ->    -10   
      
   So let's suppose sabotages should be compensated by an imaginary law,   
   at least in the direct and indirect (lose of gains) costs. That put   
   the stakes high, so high that the imaginary law includes the provision   
   that revenge never could be more expensive than costs.   
      
   Coming back to numbers, that is   
      
   -100   <-     0   
   or   
   0      ->  -100   
      
   So adding up all this game, contendants could lose   
      
   -130       -160   
      
   Not a very clever game, but in addition... someone figure it could be   
   better arranging a mayor damage, in the order of -200? No at all,   
   because you are lowering your participation in the differences, which   
   are the reasons why the contendants are contendants.   
      
   Peace.   
      
      
   --   
   Beware: nobody will clean that amount of sh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)