Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.military.naval    |    Navies of the world, past, present and f    |    118,642 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,650 of 118,642    |
|    Rightwing Outrage Machine to All    |
|    Outrage! Leftist Judge Violates Pres. Tr    |
|    12 Aug 23 01:24:14    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, or.politics       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: nowomr@protonmail.com              Judge warns Trump not to threaten witnesses in 2020 election subversion       case By Sarah N. Lynch       August 11, 20233:42 PM EDTUpdated 34 min ago                     WASHINGTON, Aug 11 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Friday granted former       U.S. President Donald Trump leeway to publicly share some non-sensitive       evidence that will be used in his trial on charges of plotting to overturn       the 2020 election, but she warned him to tread carefully before making       inflammatory public statements about the case.              “Even arguably ambiguous statements by the parties or their counsel- if       they can be reasonably interpreted to intimidate witnesses or to prejudice       potential jurors - can threaten the process," U.S. District Judge Tanya       Chutkan said on Friday. Advertisement · Scroll to continue              “I caution you and your client to take special care in your public       statements about this case. I will take whatever measures are necessary to       safeguard the integrity of these proceedings.”              Chutkan's warning came at a federal court hearing on Friday where       prosecutors and Trump's lawyers hashed out disagreements over how much       evidence in the case Trump can share with the public.              Chutkan's decision to permit Trump to share some non-sensitive material       went against the objections of prosecutors, who pointed to threatening       messages Trump posted last week on social media as evidence that he might       try to use details of the confidential evidence to intimidate witnesses.       Advertisement · Scroll to continue              The judge ruled that the government had not met its burden to show why all       of the evidence should be subject to a "protective order," which       safeguards evidence from being shared with the public in order to prevent       witness intimidation or tainting a jury pool.              At the same time, however, she agreed to protect certain records from       disclosure that Trump wanted to share, such as excerpts from the hundreds       of transcripts of witness interviews and recordings. Advertisement ·       Scroll to continue              She later officially approved a protective order that will allow Trump to       share any records that are already in the public domain or that he       obtained independently.              He is not, however, permitted to share other kinds of materials such as       those arising from the grand jury or items obtained through sealed search       warrants.              “He is a criminal defendant. He is going to have restrictions like every       single other defendant. This case is proceeding in the normal order,”       Chutkan said.              “The fact the defendant is engaged in a political campaign is not going to       allow him any greater or lesser latitude than any defendant in a criminal       case."              The charges at issue in Friday's hearing are one of three prosecutions       currently targeting Trump, the front-runner in the 2024 Republican       presidential nomination race.              Trump has pleaded not guilty to criminal charges that he orchestrated a       plot to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election to keep       himself in power.              “The existence of a political campaign is not going to have any bearing on       my decision,” Chutkan said.              It is standard for federal prosecutors to request protective orders before       sharing evidence with defense lawyers to protect confidential records and       ensure the integrity of the trial.              Often, defense lawyers do not oppose them because doing so slows down the       government's production of evidence, a process known as "discovery," to       help them prepare.              But Trump's attorneys said the scope of the protective order was too       broad, and ran afoul of his constitutionally-protected free speech rights.              "This kind of blanket order is extraordinary," Trump's lawyer John Lauro       said on Friday. "We have to face the fact we are in uncharted waters."              Federal prosecutors revealed on Friday that they will soon release to       Trump's defense team 11.6 million pages and records of evidence, in       addition to a hard drive containing images extracted from electronic       devices. 'I'M COMING AFTER YOU'              The government's request for a protective order last week cited a       threatening message Trump posted last week on social media: "IF YOU GO       AFTER ME, I'M COMING AFTER YOU."              Since then, Trump has also attacked Smith's character as well as that of       former Vice President Mike Pence, a key witness in the case, calling his       former No.2 "delusional."              As a condition of his release, Trump agreed he would not try to intimidate       or threaten any witnesses in the case, though no one has accused him of       violating those conditions.              Chutkan sought to remind Trump's lawyers about this on Friday, saying she       will be watching his statements and "scrutinizing them very carefully."              Trump is separately facing a second set of charges brought by Smith's       office in Florida for retaining highly classified records after leaving       the White House and New York state charges over hush-money payments to a       porn star.              He has pleaded not guilty in those cases as well.              At Friday's hearing, prosecutors asked the judge not to let Trump view       sensitive evidence in a room by himself, noting he has been criminally       charged in the Florida case with willfully retaining classified material.              “He has shown a tendency to hold onto material," prosecutor Thomas Windom       said.              Chutkan ruled that Trump will be allowed to view the evidence without his       lawyers present, but during that time he will be banned from having access       to electronic devices.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca