XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rec.arts.tv, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: or.politics, alt.atheism   
   From: bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
      
   PaxPerPoten  wrote in news:uc411l$2pm9j$1@dont-email.me:   
      
   > On 8/22/2023 10:03 AM, Baxter wrote:   
   >> PaxPerPoten  wrote in news:uc1tdf$2baab$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>   
   >>> On 8/20/2023 10:07 PM, Baxter wrote:   
   >>>> CHUM LEE Attorney at Law  wrote in   
   >>>> news:kkft5vFrl88U1@mid.individual.net:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 03:10:45 -0000 (UTC), Trump Is A Traitor   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Trump’s latest round of legal jeopardy leaves the Republicans   
   who   
   >>>>>> are hesitant about him   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>    He is polling at 62% and he has been indicted numerous time.   
   Every   
   >>>>>    one   
   >>>>> knows a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> Myth.  You really think your fellow citizens (on the Grand Jury) are   
   >>>> gullible?   
   >>>   
   >>> No! Victims of Prosecutor intimidation!   
   >>   
   >> Really?! So thousands and thousands of ordinary citizens are easily   
   >> intimidated when on a Grand Jury - but not on a regular jury?!   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Grand Jury jurists are led by the prosecution and there is no   
   >>> protection whatsoever from Glory seeking and Political assassination   
   >>> by corrupt Prosecutors. The victim is not even allowed legal   
   >>> representation and all his rights to refuse answers are nullified.   
   The   
   >>> Grand Jury system was designed to take down powerful citizens that   
   >>> Ordinary and fair methods could not. It has been used to politically   
   >>> assassinate and otherwise incarcerate many people. Many of which were   
   >>> guilty of nothing. Some very guilty, but unproven. Pretty much like a   
   >>> Divorce court. Nasty unproven allegations that are taken out of   
   >>> context and punished to the full extent of the Law or   
   whim...Whichever   
   >>> is handiest.   
   >>>   
   >> What?! you want TWO trials for every indictment?  A Grand Jury is not   
   a   
   >> trial - it is to determine if there is enough evidence to go to trial.   
   >> In tRump's case, the Grand Jury did not hear just from the procecutor,   
   >> but from nearly a hundred of Repuglicans involved with tRump.   
   >   
   >   
   > No, you frigging Moron. A grand Jury is used where such evidence has   
   > never been able to be manufactured by constitutional means. In   
   > other-words ..fair and square. A Grand Jury is utilized as a stacked   
   > deck against the victim. It was invented to take suspected criminals to   
   > court when no evidence supported it. In some cases it destroyed bad   
   > criminals, but over all it has been used to destroyed people that   
   called   
   > Government to task for its crimes. How many whistle blowers have been   
   > Grand Juried into extinction?   
      
   What a load of tRumpShit!!!  You have NO actual concept of Law and Order   
   nor of Criminal Justice.  You certainly know nothing of Grand Juries.   
      
   Grand Juries are entirely Constitutional - see the 5th Amendment:   
      
   "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous   
   crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)