XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, or.politics   
   XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: Skeeterweed@proton.me   
      
   In article ,   
   governor.swill@gmail.com says...   
   >   
   > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:14:11 -0000 (UTC), Baxter wrote:   
   > >Klaus  Schadenfreude  wrote   
   > >> [Default]  Skeeter  typed:   
   > >>>Trump didn't intend to take his either. I wonder if Rudy can prove   
   > >>>otherwise.   
   > >> He'll claim he can. Then he'll waddle off in that dwarf-like fashion   
   > >> that has endeared him to so many.   
   >   
   > >It will be Jack Smith that proves tRump's intent and criminality.   
   >   
   > Why do rightists continue to harp on whether or not Trump deliberately took   
   them?  That's   
   > irrelevant.  He isn't being charged with taking anything.  It's understood   
   that pols will   
   > inadvertently end up in possession of documents they worked with, even   
   classified ones.   
   > Happened to Biden, happened to Pence.  The government doesn't care how many   
   documents he   
   > *took*, classified or otherwise.   
   >   
   > NOTHING in this entire case has anything to do with Trump taking documents.    
   The subject   
   > is entirely irrelevant.   
   >   
   > AGAIN, the government's charges have NOTHING to do with the taking, they are   
   entirely   
   > about his refusal to give them back.   
   >   
   > TAKE is not the crime charged.   
   > KEEP is the crime charged.   
   >   
   > For the brain impaired, those two capitalized words don't mean the same   
   thing.   
   >   
   > Swill   
      
   So he was allowed to take them but forced to return them?   
      
   --   
   " They're not after me, they are after you! I'm just in the way"   
   " Go Peacefully"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)