Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.military.naval    |    Navies of the world, past, present and f    |    118,642 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,849 of 118,642    |
|    DeSantis Sucking Elon's Dick to All    |
|    Biden Nailed Trump, Obama Got Osama - Is    |
|    25 Aug 23 02:47:00    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rec.arts.tv, talk.politics.misc       XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism       From: nowomr@protonmail.com              The Justice Department sued Elon Musk’s SpaceX on Thursday, alleging the       company routinely discriminated against refugees and asylum seekers in its       hiring process.              According to the lawsuit, SpaceX officials said on numerous occasions       between 2018 and last year that it could hire only U.S. citizens and       green-card holders because of restrictive export control laws governing       the use of rocket and missile technology. The government cited several       cases in which the company made this assertion publicly and listed       citizenship as a requirement in job postings, even though “export control       laws impose no such hiring restrictions.”       Tech is not your friend. We are. Sign up for The Tech Friend newsletter.              “Our investigation found that SpaceX failed to fairly consider or hire       asylees and refugees because of their citizenship status and imposed what       amounted to a ban on their hire regardless of their qualification, in       violation of federal law,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of       the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department said in a statement       announcing the lawsuit. “Our investigation also found that SpaceX       recruiters and high-level officials took actions that actively discouraged       asylees and refugees from seeking work opportunities at the company.”       Advertisement              SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment. SpaceX officials have for       years asserted in interviews that its hiring practices were dictated by       the requirements of a federal law known as the International Traffic in       Arms Regulation.              Like many rocket companies, SpaceX takes ITAR seriously. It closely guards       access to its manufacturing facilities and limits what outside       photographers and videographers can shoot for fear of sensitive designs       being made public.              The work SpaceX and other space companies do is so sensitive that recently       the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, the FBI and the Air       Force Office of Special Investigations issued a joint bulletin about       foreign intelligence threats to the U.S. space industry.              In the bulletin, the agencies said foreign intelligence entities       “recognize the importance of the commercial space industry to the U.S.       economy and national security, including the growing dependence of       critical infrastructure on space-based assets. They see U.S. space related       innovation and assets as potential threats as well as valuable       opportunities to acquire vital technologies and expertise.”       Advertisement              As a result, adversaries are using “cyberattacks, strategic investments       (including joint ventures and acquisitions), targeting of key supply chain       nodes, and other techniques to access and exploit the U.S. space       industry.”              But the bulletin said nothing about hiring as a potential concern.              The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, an industry group       to which SpaceX belongs, wouldn’t comment on the lawsuit. But in a       statement, it noted that its members take the requirements of ITAR       seriously. “ITAR applies to everything AIAA does and the Institute       carefully assures we operate within the ITAR requirements,” the statement       said.              In its suit, the Justice Department said it opened its investigation in       2020 “and found reasonable cause to believe that SpaceX had engaged in a       pattern or practice of unfair immigration-related employment practices.”       Advertisement              In one instance, the lawsuit says, Musk, SpaceX’s founder and chief       executive, posted on Twitter in 2020 that “U.S. law requires at least a       green card to be hired at SpaceX, as rockets are advanced weapons       technology.” Investigators also found at least 14 public announcements       “stating that SpaceX can only hire U.S. citizens and lawful permanent       residents” because of the International Traffic in Arms Regulation, the       lawsuit alleges.              The lawsuit says that, according to SpaceX data, the company hired only       one person out of more than 10,000 hires “who was an asylee and identified       as such in his application.” SpaceX made that hire, the lawsuit asserts,       about four months after the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section at the       Justice Department had notified the company of its investigation. The       lawsuit notes that SpaceX hires for “a wide variety of positions”       including “welders, cooks, crane operators, information technology       specialists, software engineers, dishwashers, business analysts, rocket       engineers, marketing professionals, baristas, and more.”              SpaceX in recent years has become one of the top suppliers for NASA and       the Pentagon and a trusted partner to launch American astronauts to the       International Space Station, as well as sensitive national security       satellites. SpaceX is scheduled to launch its seventh crew rotation       mission to the station Friday morning. The Pentagon has also awarded       SpaceX a contract to operate its Starlink internet satellite network in       Ukraine, where it has been a key communications tool for the Ukrainian       military.       Advertisement              Clarke said the Justice Department intends to “hold SpaceX accountable for       its illegal employment practices and seek relief that allows asylees and       refugees to fairly compete for job opportunities and contribute their       talents to SpaceX’s workforce.” Clarke added that “asylees and refugees       have overcome many obstacles in their lives, and unlawful employment       discrimination based on their citizenship status should not be one of       them.”              The lawsuit seeks an order for SpaceX to hire qualified applicants it       wrongly said were ineligible and to pay “an appropriate civil penalty as       determined by the Administrative Law Judge for each individual       discriminated against.” Over the years, the company, based in Hawthorne,       Calif., has grown rapidly and has about 11,000 employees at locations in       California, Florida, Texas, Washington state and the District of Columbia.              This is not the first time a Musk company has faced bias accusations.       Tesla, the electric vehicle manufacturer Musk leads, for years has battled       lawsuits alleging workplace discrimination against its Black employees,       including one filed by California’s state workplace regulator last year.       In April, a judge ordered the company to pay a Black ex-worker more than       $3 million. And in June, about 240 Black Tesla workers filed for class-       action status in a case alleging rampant racism at the Fremont, Calif.,       factory.              Tesla also has faced lawsuits alleging sexual harassment, and former       Twitter employees filed a suit this month alleging that Musk’s layoffs       discriminated based on gender, race and age. Twitter workers in Africa and       Twitter workers with disabilities have also sued. SpaceX has faced claims       of age discrimination in the past.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca