XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, or.politics   
   XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: Skeeterweed@proton.me   
      
   In article , bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > Klaus Schadenfreude wrote   
   > in news:tsdmeip53io25cp8mpubi66ad1fmn5cos1   
   > @Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:   
   >   
   > > [Default] Baxter typed:   
   > >   
   > >>Klaus Schadenfreude    
   > wrote   
   > >>in   
   > >>   
   > news:ee2lei16ap5j4q5t7nsf9m9tpucdei0k9g@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck   
   > >>ing.dwarf.com:   
   > >>   
   > >>> [Default] Baxter typed:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>Klaus Schadenfreude    
   > >>wrote   
   > >>>>in   
   > >>>>   
   > >>   
   > news:gb8keilhpmseh6f586189en40v30fgvn5i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck   
   > >>>>ing.dwarf.com:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>On 8/26/2023 8:08 AM, Charlie Glock, stupid cocksucking gun-   
   > fondling   
   > >>>>>>moron, lied:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> On 2023-08-26, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   > >>>>>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter typed:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> t's only theft when you refuse to return it.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> You're the dumbest motherfucker alive.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Yes, it's theft, whether you return it or not, you stupid fuck.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> ROFLMAO!!!!!   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> While Biden did have the power to declassify documents when he   
   > was   
   > >>>>>>> VP, thank you Obama, he did not have that privilege when he was a   
   > >>>>>>> senator. Some documents allegedly were taken from the SCIF which   
   > is   
   > >>>>>>> a huge violation.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>*Senator* Biden took no classified documents from a SCIF.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Yes he did, "Cunt Flaps."   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>Prove it!   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Already proven. He had them and he wasn't supposed to have them.   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >>That's not proof of theft.   
   > >   
   > > Possession of stolen property.   
   >   
   > You got any proof of theft? Simple possession is not proof of theft. I   
   > guess KKKlaun says that if Joe Blow comes to your house and loses his   
   > billfold in your sofa and later your kids find it, that's proof that you   
   > stole it - because you're in possesion of property you're not supposed to   
   > have.   
      
   Did someone just happen to lose the documents at Joes place?   
      
   --   
   " They're not after me, they are after you! I'm just in the way"   
      
   " Go Peacefully"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|