XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, or.politics   
   XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Baxter"  wrote in message   
   news:ucfq8i$17il8$5@dont-email.me...   
   > Klaus  Schadenfreude  wrote   
   > in news:tsdmeip53io25cp8mpubi66ad1fmn5cos1   
   > @Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:   
   >   
   >> [Default]  Baxter  typed:   
   >>   
   >>>Klaus  Schadenfreude    
   > wrote   
   >>>in   
   >>>   
   > news:ee2lei16ap5j4q5t7nsf9m9tpucdei0k9g@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck   
   >>>ing.dwarf.com:   
   >>>   
   >>>> [Default]  Baxter  typed:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Klaus  Schadenfreude    
   >>>wrote   
   >>>>>in   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   > news:gb8keilhpmseh6f586189en40v30fgvn5i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck   
   >>>>>ing.dwarf.com:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>On 8/26/2023 8:08 AM, Charlie Glock, stupid cocksucking gun-   
   > fondling   
   >>>>>>>moron, lied:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2023-08-26, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> [Default]  Baxter  typed:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> t's only theft when you refuse to return it.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You're the dumbest motherfucker alive.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Yes, it's theft, whether you return it or not, you stupid fuck.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> ROFLMAO!!!!!   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> While Biden did have the power to declassify documents when he   
   > was   
   >>>>>>>> VP, thank you Obama, he did not have that privilege when he was a   
   >>>>>>>> senator. Some documents allegedly were taken from the SCIF which   
   > is   
   >>>>>>>> a huge violation.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>*Senator* Biden took no classified documents from a SCIF.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes he did, "Cunt Flaps."   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Prove it!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Already proven. He had them and he wasn't supposed to have them.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>That's not proof of theft.   
   >>   
   >> Possession of stolen property.   
   >   
   > You got any proof of theft?  Simple possession is not proof of theft.   
      
   In the case of classified documents.. simple possession is all the proof   
   required.   
      
   Are you suppose to have those documents? No.   
   Are you in possession of those documents? Yes.   
      
   Guilty.   
      
   The law is most clear on this..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)