XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, or.politics
XPost: alt.atheism
From: Skeeterweed@proton.me
In article <3O3HM.169440$nEzb.53556@fx36.iad>, bondrock@ifx.net says...
>
> On 8/28/2023 5:49 AM, scooter lied:
>
> > "Baxter" wrote in message
> > news:ucfq8i$17il8$5@dont-email.me...
> >> [Default] KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew
and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
> >>
> >>> [Default] Baxter typed:
> >>>
> >>>> [Default] KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew
and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
> >>>>
> >>>>> [Default] Baxter typed:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> [Default] KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake
Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [Default] Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional,
social, literary and physical superior to KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent
and harmless Nazi fake Jew, *wrote*:
>
> Yep! That's the default, all right. *HA HA HA HA HA HA HA*!
>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 8/26/2023 8:08 AM, Charlie Glock, stupid cocksucking
gun-fondling moron, lied:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [Default] KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake
Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
> >>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter typed:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> t's only theft when you refuse to return it.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You're the dumbest motherfucker alive.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, it's theft, whether you return it or not, you stupid fuck.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ROFLMAO!!!!!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> While Biden did have the power to declassify documents when he
> >> was
> >>>>>>>>> VP, thank you Obama, he did not have that privilege when he was a
> >>>>>>>>> senator. Some documents allegedly were taken from the SCIF which
> >> is
> >>>>>>>>> a huge violation.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> *Senator* Biden took no classified documents from a SCIF.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes he did, "Cunt Flaps."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Prove it!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Already proven. He had them and he wasn't supposed to have them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> That's not proof of theft.
> >>>
> >>> Possession of stolen property.
> >>
> >> You got any proof of theft? Simple possession is not proof of theft.
> >
> > In the case of classified documents.. simple possession is all the proof
required.
>
> Cite the law, scooter.
>
> >
> > Are you suppose to have those documents? No.
> > Are you in possession of those documents? Yes.
> >
> > Guilty.
> >
> > The law is most clear on this..
>
> Cite the law, scooter.
>
> This should be good.
He already did. You're just trolling.
--
" They're not after me, they are after you! I'm just in the way"
" Go Peacefully"
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
