XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, or.politics
XPost: alt.atheism
From: bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
Skeeter wrote in
news:MPG.3f57bfbe4b6294d598ee0b@usnews.blocknews.net:
> In article ,
> NoIronInMyJunk_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA says...
>>
>> On 8/29/2023 6:47 AM, scooter lied:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > "Baxter" wrote in message
>> > news:ucim2u$1q00t$1@dont-email.me...
>> >> [Default] Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
>> >> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>> >>
>> >>> In article ,
>> >>> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [Default] KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi
>> >>>> fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > [Default] Baxter typed:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >> [Default] KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi
>> >>>> >> fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>> [Default] Baxter typed:
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>>>You're beating a dead horse.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Oh I realize that!
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> You're too stupid to be taught the meanings of words, and
>> >>>> >>> like to change them to suit your agenda (eg. men and women)
>> >>>> >>> That's how Democrats are. They are terminally stupid.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>Your horse is not only dead, it's fake.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > ANd Baxter runs
>> >>>>
>> >>>> More like bored to death with your stupidity.
>> >>>
>> >>> You were wrong and he slapped you with the truth.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> There is no evidence that when the documents entered the
>> >> possession of either Biden or Pence that they were not entitled to
>> >> have them. There IS evidence that tRump actively took documents
>> >> as he left the White House that he knew he was not entitled to
>> >> possess.
>> >
>> > BS... the President is entitled to all classified materials.
>>
>> *Until* he leaves office, scooter. Trump stopped being president at
>> noon on 01/20/2021. When he took the boxes of documents to Florida,
>> he was *stealing* them, scooter. When he refused to give them back
>> upon request and after being subpoenaed, he was *obstructing*,
>> scooter. When he tried to destroy surveillance video footage showing
>> his obstruction, he was *further* obstructing, scooter.
>
> No theft charges.
>
So? Do you think the charges against him are not enough? Is there any
reason why he HAS to be charged with theft? Not every criminal is
charged with every crime they commit - in fact the overwhelming majority
of criminals are NOT charged with every crime.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
