Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.military.naval    |    Navies of the world, past, present and f    |    118,661 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 118,182 of 118,661    |
|    The Fall of Fox News to All    |
|    Are EV's a Conspiracy By Rightist Transs    |
|    17 Oct 23 22:07:44    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rec.arts.tv, talk.politics.misc       XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism       From: nowomr@protonmail.com              Murdoch Chronicler Michael Wolff Foresees the Fall of Fox News: “It Will       Cease to Exist in Its Present Form”              In a wide-ranging interview on the eve of publication of his new book, the       author talks about his methods, predictions, and the criticism that his       reporting is not to be trusted. (Plus, Tucker Carlson and Roger Ailes.)       “At a certain level of power, it’s a leaky sieve,” he says, “and I’m there       to catch the water.”              By Joe Pompeo       September 20, 2023                     A Michael Wolff book tends to be something of an event, with spicy       excerpts and embargo-defying leaks flowing forth in the lead-up to       publication. The first such tell-all in Wolff’s blockbuster Trumpworld       trilogy, 2018’s Fire and Fury, was a Category 5 media shitstorm, propelled       to the top of the best-seller list through a potent mix of conservative       outrage, liberal schadenfreude, and the requisite controversy around       allegations of inaccuracy and Wolff’s less-than-conventional journalistic       methods. (A Saturday Night Live spoof starring Fred Armisen as Wolff       certainly didn’t hurt.) The second and third installments, 2019’s Siege       and 2021’s Landslide, didn’t hit shelves with quite the same fervor, but       that was to be expected—there’s only so much Trump Sturm und Drang that       any one human can stomach. Now, with The Fall: The End of Fox News and the       Murdoch Dynasty, Wolff has directed his poison pen back to a topic that       helped make his name.              For those of you who haven’t read Wolff’s 2008 biography, The Man Who Owns       the News: Inside the Secret World of Rupert Murdoch (for which the       author’s subject, famously and to much regret, granted a stunning level of       access), The Fall brings you up to speed on the lives of Rupert and his       three Succession-inspiring children, Lachlan, James, and Elisabeth, whose       apparently competing visions for the future of their father’s most       polarizing and influential media outlet, Fox News, provide the narrative       tension. The elder Murdoch siblings (let’s not forget about Prudence,       though she remains a bit more in the background) share the spotlight, for       the most part, with a triumvirate of Fox News prime-time personalities,       Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham, whose fates at the       money-minting cable news channel hang in the balance.       Where Wall Street, Washington, and Silicon Valley meet.       Your email              By signing up you agree to our User Agreement and Privacy Policy & Cookie       Statement. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy       Policy and Terms of Service apply.              But enough of the thematics—you came here for the down and dirty, which       The Fall serves up like Page Six on steroids: Roger Ailes’s “American       blow-job test”; 14-year-old Carlson losing his virginity at a Nevada       brothel; Murdoch’s fourth wife telling friends that his two daughters from       his third wife tried to “poison” her by slipping shellfish into a pasta       entree, despite knowledge of her “intense allergy” (neither Carlson nor       the daughters say anything about this stuff in the book); also, robust       insinuations of alcoholism that our lawyers would probably rather we not       repeat here. Some readers will dismiss the book as the work of an       unreliable narrator. (“Is it considered fiction?” one such skeptic sniffed       after I mentioned that my advance copy was in hand.) Others will celebrate       it as a PR-slaying gossip dump from a man unafraid to poke the hornet’s       nest of power. Wherever you land on that spectrum, good chance you will at       least find it entertaining. (Fox Corporation didn’t have a comment and Fox       News has been giving out the following statement: “The fact that this       author’s books are spoofed by ‘Saturday Night Live’ is really all we need       to know.”)              I caught up with Wolff a week before his September 26 pub date to talk       about all of this and more. Our condensed and edited conversation is       below.              Vanity Fair: Are you ready for the onslaught, if there is to be one?              Michael Wolff: No. I never am.              Read the Book Here       All products featured on Vanity Fair are independently selected by our       editors. However when you buy something through...              All products featured on Vanity Fair are independently selected by our       editors. However, when you buy something through our retail links, we may       earn an affiliate commission.       Preorder on Amazon       Preorder on Bookshop              You get nervous when your books are about to come out?              You start to feel a jumble of, oh, my God, what have I not thought about       here? I mean, the logical thing to think about is, what are the Murdochs       going to do? How are they going to respond? I haven’t thought about that       until now, which is strange because I’ve been through this before.              The Fall is as much about the Murdochs as it is about Fox. Did you       approach this as a sort of postscript to The Man Who Owns the News?              I didn’t. It actually began because I was interested in Tucker. I think       that’s a story that involves all kinds of strains of what’s politically       going on right now. And then as we came into 2022, with Dominion [which       brought a billion-dollar libel suit against Fox], with Rupert being older       and older and older, with messages that I began to get from the James       camp, I thought, there’s a denouement here. And then, you add in strains       of the Murdoch-Fox-Trump relationship, and I thought, the end is nigh.              The subtitle is “the End of Fox News” because you believe that whatever       happens after Rupert dies, it’s going to become a fundamentally different       network, or because you actually think the network will cease to exist?              I think it will cease to exist in its present form. I think it will go       into a radical transition in which, either James Murdoch will take over       and change it into something else, or they will sell it. Fox has existed       in its present state just for one reason: It’s controlled by Rupert       Murdoch, who is the one man who can stand up, or has been able to stand       up, to the political and social opprobrium at a fierce, fierce level, and       to do this for the sake of making enormous amounts of money. But when he       departs, that changes very clearly and very quickly.              1 year for just $29.99 $8 + a free tote.       Subscribe Now              The prospect of James, with the support of his sisters, wresting control       of the company from Lachlan after Rupert dies—that’s been floated in       previous reportage, but in more of an informed speculation sort of way. I       mean there’s a reason why that idea ends up in a Maureen Dowd column. You       go very in depth on it. It’s one of the narrative arcs of the book, with       this added ripple that James wants to keep Fox and turn it into “a force       for good,” and Liz wants to sell it. It sounds like you think one of those              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca