XPost: or.politics, seattle.politics, ca.politics
XPost: rec.aviation.military, soc.history.war.misc
From: robberbaron@invalid.ut
Baxter wrote:
> Mittens Romney wrote in
> news:vcuj6v$3827s$8@dont-email.me:
>
>> Baxter wrote:
>>> your's is the lie
>>
>> AGAIN and AGAIN:
>>
> https://imgur.
AGAIN:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2024-09-20/arizona-supreme-court-
ules-98000-ineligible-voters-can-vote-2024-election
Arizona was one of many states alleged to have been rife with voter
fraud following the 2020 Presidential Election. Along with Nevada,
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Arizona issued
objections to the electoral votes won by President Joe Biden, ultimately
to no avail. While states like Georgia and others who issued objections
to the outcome of the 2020 election results took swift action to rectify
issues with their electoral systems in the years that followed,
Arizona's lack of similar efforts has left the state plagued with the
same problems it faced in 2020. The Arizona Supreme Court's ruling that
nearly 98,000 voters wrongly classified by a database "error" will be
eligible to vote in elections despite their absence of proof of
citizenship highlights the consequences of the state's failure to
correct those systemic failures and the continued threat they pose to
the integrity of the outcome of the 2024 Presidential Election.
https://www.abc15.com/news/political/elections/court-rules-nearl
-98-000-arizonans-whose-citizenship-hadnt-been-confirmed-can-vot
-the-full-ballot
Court says county officials lack the authority to change voter statuses
because those voters had attested that they are citizens.
Got it yet?
GOOD!
--
⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
