XPost: or.politics, seattle.politics, ca.politics   
   XPost: rec.aviation.military, soc.history.war.misc   
   From: robberbaron@invalid.ut   
      
   Baxter wrote:   
   > Squirrel! Squirrel!   
      
   AGAIN:   
      
      
   https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2024-09-20/arizona-supreme-court-   
   ules-98000-ineligible-voters-can-vote-2024-election   
      
   Arizona was one of many states alleged to have been rife with voter   
   fraud following the 2020 Presidential Election. Along with Nevada,   
   Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Arizona issued   
   objections to the electoral votes won by President Joe Biden, ultimately   
   to no avail. While states like Georgia and others who issued objections   
   to the outcome of the 2020 election results took swift action to rectify   
   issues with their electoral systems in the years that followed,   
   Arizona's lack of similar efforts has left the state plagued with the   
   same problems it faced in 2020. The Arizona Supreme Court's ruling that   
   nearly 98,000 voters wrongly classified by a database "error" will be   
   eligible to vote in elections despite their absence of proof of   
   citizenship highlights the consequences of the state's failure to   
   correct those systemic failures and the continued threat they pose to   
   the integrity of the outcome of the 2024 Presidential Election.   
      
   https://www.abc15.com/news/political/elections/court-rules-nearl   
   -98-000-arizonans-whose-citizenship-hadnt-been-confirmed-can-vot   
   -the-full-ballot   
      
      
   Court says county officials lack the authority to change voter statuses   
   because those voters had attested that they are citizens   
      
   --   
   ⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)