XPost: or.politics, rec.aviation.military, seattle.politics
From: bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
a425couple wrote in news:j11VQ.26637$TwW8.10672
@fx13.iad:
> On 11/21/25 18:22, Webbster wrote:
>> a425couple wrote in news:d67UQ.39510
$pEH7.14147
>> @fx18.iad:
>>
>>> On 11/21/25 07:20, Elendil wrote:
>>>> Sounds pretty straightforward to me. Anyways it was all in good fun
>> and
>>>> Trump was in on it, not calling on any executions. No "Off with her
>>>> head," today.
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>> It is fairly straightforward. And our military and law enforcement
>>> members are regularly trained on it.
>>> All is well.
>>>
>>> Be very careful if you decide on your own that an order is illegal.
>>> Your supervisors often know more than you do.
>>> And getting that decision wrong can be very dangerous.
>>>
>>> But then 5 nitwit Democrats decided to act superior and criticize
>>> POTUS Trump for something they thought he might do.
>>> Never miss a chance to criticize for something that might happen.
>>> They wanted a reaction, and they got it.
>>
>> Dems in Congress have arrainged for increased security. Perhaps you
>> think it a jap, but too many of your conservaturd brothers take it as
>> marching orders.
>
> Webbster, I have trouble believing you really approve of
> the sedition these 6 Democrats are sowing.
Sedition?!! How is it sedition to resist an ILLEGAL order?
Answer this: are soldiers allowed to disobey an ILLGAL order? Are the
not REQUIRED to resist an ILLEGAL order?
I say that any soldier that obeys an ILLEGAL order is as criminal as the
person who issued that ILLEGAL order.
--
@..@
(----)
----------
United we ribbit, divided we croak
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
