From: maxupixu@in.val.it   
      
   Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:05:47 -0500, JAB wrote:   
   > On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 22:30:13 -0000 (UTC), Kara M'bola   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>Why is it up to "animal rights activists" to find the solution?   
   >   
   > Their "motor mouths" are engaged, while sitting on their sofas.  And,   
   > some of them are "feeding" the problem, instead of picking up the   
   > cats' shit.   
   >   
   > Activists - "Someone who's actively involved in a protest or a   
   > political or social cause can be called an activist."   
   >   
   > The onus is upon these "activists" to suggest a realistic solution(s).   
      
   It's interesting to see how strictly you've chosen your side in this   
   case. Your position seems to base purely on the bias that the activists   
   are the only "baddies" here. Your fondness of my RAW quote makes it   
   even more interesting :)   
      
   > Again, "The problem is pitting scientists trying to save threatened   
   > marine mammals and other creatures against animal rights activists   
   > trying to save abandoned cats."   
   >   
   > "You need to stop it at the source and that means preventing cats from   
   > defecating in the environment..."   
      
   I did read the article. Take it easy on the tautology.   
      
   > Problem is the activists   
      
   I get your point, believe me. But without knowing the activists' take (I   
   didn't see them interviewed in the article), I can't just start fully   
   blaming them for the problem. Remember the part in the quote that goes   
   "unconscious dogmatism that makes people think their way of looking at   
   reality is the only sane way of viewing the world"?   
      
   --   
   :q!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)