Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,779 of 12,750    |
|    AES to All    |
|    Re: mode matching to confocal etalon    |
|    12 Oct 10 09:41:28    |
      4e726f20       From: siegman@stanford.edu              Let's recall that the basic reason for using a _confocal_ resonator is       that in a confocal resonator the resonance frequencies of all the       even-numbered higher-order transverse modes of the resonator line up and       overlap exactly on top of the axial-mode resonance frequencies for the       lowest-order (TEM00) mode.              At the same time, the resonance frequencies of all the odd-numbered       transverse modes all line up at exactly halfway between these axial       modes.              If the input beam is not perfectly aligned and/or focused and/or       mode-matched into the interferometer, all that happens is that you       excite a coherent mixture of even (or odd) modes inside the       interferometer -- but since these have individual resonances all lined       up right on top of each other in frequency, you get a single resonance       transmission line.              The net result is that you do not need to perfectly align and focus and       carefully "transverse mode match" the input beam into the lowest-order       TEM00 mode of the resonator (at least for higher-order transverse mode       orders up to some point where the paraxial mode approximation begins to       fail).              In brief: transverse mode matching requirements are greatly relaxed.              There are, however, three problems you have to be concerned about in       this:              1) Since this overlapping occurs right at the TEM00 axial modes for       even-symmetry modes but halfway in between (at the "half-axial modes")       for odd-symmetry modes, the effective free spectral range for the       interferometer is halved.              2) And, you will find out that if you have a reasonably high finesse in       your interferometer, and you want to have a substantial relaxation in       mode matching requirement, the confocal condition in the interferometer       must be very accurately met. In practical terms, the effective finesse       will deteriorate very rapidly with *very* small changes in length of the       interferometer. (Been there, done that!)              3) And, something I'd never really pondered before: If your input       beam profile and alignment is such that it excites a _mixture_ of even       and odd modes (pEven power in even modes, pOdd power in odd modes) in       the interferometer, then you will get alternate resonance responses,       spaced by half the FSR of a planar FP of the same length, with relative       amplitudes of pEven and pOdd.              [LASERS, p. 763, and others. I need to look back and dig out: Who was       it who first recognized this?]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca