Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,809 of 12,750    |
|    boxman to All    |
|    Re: lenses and the 2nd law    |
|    24 Jan 11 18:17:21    |
      XPost: sci.physics, sci.electronics.basics       From: boxman@voyager.net              > There was an article in SciAm, ages ago, about a non-imaging optical       > system that could heat an object to above the sun's surface       > temperature. Sounds fishy, except that the sun does emit a lot of UV,       > energy past the black-body peak wavelength, which could be useful if       > concentrated enough. Like, 84,000:1.       >                     Actually to be fair, the ratio you list (84,000:1) is the concentration       ratio provided by the system which can produce irradiance levels higher       than the sun. There are no tricks used in regards to using UV energy or       something like that. The absorber is simply immersed in an index of       refraction that is different from air. The temperature of the abosrber       reached however will never exceed that of the sun as a blackbody since       the absorber immersed in a higher refractive index also radiates more       than one immersed in air, thus the temperatures remain equal in theory.        I don't think the SciAm article lists the temperature as being       higher, I think it talks about the irradiance being higher, which are       two different quantities. See the following link for further details              http://www.solideas.com/papers/GPS_ThermCon_SEMSC.pdf              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca