XPost: sci.electronics.design   
   From: B@rt_The_Sheriff_Is_A_Nig***!.org   
      
   On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:55:39 -0400, JW  wrote:   
      
   >On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:36:56 -0700 John Larkin   
   > wrote in Message id:   
   >:   
   >   
   >>On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:34:54 -0700, AES  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> > Is there any hidden connection between the insistence of these LEDs on   
   >>>> > continuing to emit light long after they've been turned off, and the   
   >>>> > insistence of the participants in this thread in continuing to re-emit   
   >>>> > screenfuls and screenfuls of previous posts, before finally adding a   
   >>>> > one-sentence comment at the end?!?!?!   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Modern newsreaders often run on machines with LED backlights?  ;)   
   >>>> Cheers,  Phil Hobbs   
   >>>   
   >>>This thread really has been off the charts in the unwillingness of   
   >>>posters to trim out unnecessary cruft when they reply!   
   >>   
   >>Get some scroll bars. They're not expensive.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Even easier if you're using Agent and perhaps other newsreaders. Use your   
   >scroll wheel. One click will page down.   
      
     The only thing worse than the Usenet pussy you responded to is your   
   Usenet pussy response.   
      
     The 'cruft' that needs trimming is you pussified, brainless fucktards.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)