Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,880 of 12,750    |
|    Louis Boyd to Speedy    |
|    Re: What is the apparent distance of an     |
|    12 May 11 08:38:20    |
      8cf1dd51       From: boyd@apt0.sao.arizona.edu              Speedy wrote:       > Hello,       >       > When I look at an object through a lens what is the apparent distance       > of that object when both the observer and the object are closer to the       > lens than its focal length?       >       > Background: I would like to focus a camera system at a particular       > distance. However, our lab is not large enough to cover that distance.       > Rather, I would like to place the camera inside a rack where it looks       > at a target and then focus on that target. Since the target is much       > closer than the distance I would like to focus the camera on I would       > place a lense between the camera and the target. For example, this       > could be a lens with 1m focal length. The lens is placed about 10-15cm       > above the camera and the target is placed behind the lens at some       > distance.       >       > How can I compute where the target should be placed so that to the       > camera it appears it be at the desired distance?       >       > Thanks in advance for any help!       >       > Regards,       > Marcus              You cannot simulate exactly an object which is at a further distance       than it actually is from the camera if the object is large compared to       the aperture of the camera lens and the actual distance is limited. The       perspective to the object will be wrong. Even with a large aperture       lens you need a telecentric lens design to get a more distant       effective perspective. If you simply want the image to be smaller on       the film (or sensor) just use a shorter focal length lens, but that will       not give the same perspective as having the object placed at a further       distance.              You can use a large (at least half as large as the object ) flat mirror       in the room to double the optical distance from the camera to the       object. Or use two mirrors to triple the distance. With an even number       of mirrors the object will regain it's left-right hand appearance.       However, the mirror nearest the target will need to be over 2/3 the       linear size of the target for two mirrors, or 4/5's for four mirrors       give an effective five times the distance.              You could use your camera and existing lens to act as a large       telecentric lens by moving the camera in in an X-Y grid (z being toward       the object) pattern then tiling the centers (or offsets from the center       depending on the desired perspective) of each image together to form a       new image with an effectively longer (even infinite) perspective. A       10x10 array of images would probably be sufficient so that the edge       distortions of each image would not be detectable or at least not       noticeable. It would be tedious work to do manually.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca